BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 25
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 8 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is x>y?

Expert replies
by Mormuse » Wed Apr 10, 2013 2:04 am
1) x+y+2sq rt (xy)=0
2) x2+y2=0.

Statement 1 is sufficient. I dont get it. I see the pattern (sq rt x+ sq rt y)2 which leads to sq rt x = - sq rt y...
Could you please help?
Many thx
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Anju@Gurome » Wed Apr 10, 2013 2:16 am
claudayst wrote:Is x > y?

1) x + y + 2√(xy) = 0
2) x² + y² = 0
Statement 1: x + y = -2√(xy)
Squaring both sides, (x + y)² = [-2√(xy)]²
--> x² + 2xy + y² = 4xy
--> x² - 2xy + y² = 0
--> (x - y)² = 0
--> (x - y) = 0
--> x = y

Sufficient

Statement 2: As x² and y² cannot be negative, only way (x² + y²) can be equal to zero if x = y = 0

Sufficient

The correct answer is D.
Anju Agarwal
Quant Expert, Gurome

Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.

§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §
Join the discussion

by rohankamath619 » Wed Apr 10, 2013 3:57 am
My approach was a little different. Anju, can you please let me know if this is correct?

x + y + 2√(xy) = 0 can also be expressed as (√x+√y)²=0 That would leave us with:
√x+√y = 0
√x = - √y
x = y
Join the discussion

by Anju@Gurome » Wed Apr 10, 2013 4:20 am
rohankamath619 wrote:My approach was a little different. Anju, can you please let me know if this is correct?

x + y + 2√(xy) = 0 can also be expressed as (√x+√y)²=0 That would leave us with:
√x+√y = 0
√x = - √y
x = y
Although you've reached the correct conclusion, this is not mathematically correct.
By definition, √x is the positive square root of x (if x ≠ 0).
Hence, it is not possible that √x = -√y = -(some positive number, again if y ≠ 0)

Now, where did you go wrong?
Your initial interpretation "x + y + 2√(xy) = 0 can also be expressed as (√x+√y)²=0" is correct. But this could lead to only one possible solution : as √x and √y are non-negative, both x and y must be equal to zero.

But by doing so, we are discarding a large number of possible solutions which is x = y as I have deduced. When did we discarded those solutions? As soon as we introduced √x and √y.

Let me explain with an example...
If we assume x = y = -1, then √x and √y are not defined (in the scope of GMAT).
But, x + y + 2√(xy) = (-1) + (-1) + 2*√[(-1)*(-1)] = -2 + 2√1 = 0

In fact, for statement 1 to be true, x and y must be equal to some non-positive integer. If, x = y = some positive integer, then x + y + 2√(xy) is always greater than zero.

Hope that helps.
Anju Agarwal
Quant Expert, Gurome

Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.

§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §
Join the discussion

by rohankamath619 » Tue Apr 16, 2013 7:32 am
Thanks Anju, that helps.
Join the discussion