-
Nidhs
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:12 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:1 members
My question basically refers to the usage of nominative case vs the objective case
According to the rule;
A nominative case should be used as the complement of the verb to be when to be has no subject
for example
It is I
To be she would be a hardhip
They need the quarterback to be he who has a cool head and a strong throwing arm
and a objective case should be used as the complement of the verb to when to be has a subject
for example
What I wouldnt give to be her
I am thoroughly confused at this point withthe usage of nominative vs objective in "to be" especially the last example.
also
This is the man (who / that/whom) I wanted to speak to and whose name I'd forgotten
According to the rule;
A nominative case should be used as the complement of the verb to be when to be has no subject
for example
It is I
To be she would be a hardhip
They need the quarterback to be he who has a cool head and a strong throwing arm
and a objective case should be used as the complement of the verb to when to be has a subject
for example
What I wouldnt give to be her
I am thoroughly confused at this point withthe usage of nominative vs objective in "to be" especially the last example.
also
This is the man (who / that/whom) I wanted to speak to and whose name I'd forgotten












