Ingrid: Rock music has produced no songs as durable as the s

This topic has expert replies
Moderator
Posts: 7187
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
Followed by:23 members

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

Ingrid: Rock music has produced no songs as durable as the songs of the 1940s, which continue to be recorded by numerous performers.
Jerome: True, rock songs are usually recorded only once. If the original recording continues to be popular, however, that fact can indicate durability, and the best rock songs will prove to be durable. Jerome responds to Ingrid's claim by -

A. intentionally misinterpreting the claim
B. showing that the claim necessarily leads to a contradiction
C. undermining the truth of the evidence that Ingrid presents
D. suggesting an alternative standard for judging the point at issue
E. claiming that Ingrid's knowledge of the period under discussion is incomplete

OA D

Source: Manhattan Prep
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Legendary Member
Posts: 2214
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pm
Followed by:5 members

edited

by deloitte247 » Fri May 10, 2019 5:04 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

OPTION A - INCORRECT
Here, Jerome's response to Ingrid is not an international misinterpretation of the claim. It is more like a claim from Jerome's point of view.

OPTION B - INCORRECT
Jerome responded with the true meaning that he agrees to Ingrid's claim. This shows that the claim does not necessarily lead to contracdiction because Jerome agrees with Ingrid's claim

OPTION C - INCORRECT
At first, Jerome supports Ingrid's claim by replying with "true, rock songs are usually recorded once" unlike Ingrid who claims that rock music continue to be recorded by various performers.

OPTION D - CORRECT
Jerome simply suggests an alternative standard for judging the point at issue which is rock songs are usually recorded only once" unlike Ingrid who claims that rock music continue to be recorded by various performers.

OPTION E - INCORRECT
There is no indication in Jerome's claim that shows that Ingrid's knowledge of the period under discussion is incomplete.