BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

not clear on 2nd statement

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Anurag@Gurome » Mon Apr 18, 2011 8:16 pm
alltimeacheiver wrote:Is positive integer n - 1 a multiple of 3?

(1) n^3 - n is a multiple of 3

(2) n^3 + 2n^2+ n is a multiple of 3
(1) n^3 - n = n(n² - 1) = n(n - 1)(n + 1), which are consecutive integers.
So, n(n - 1)(n + 1) is a multiple of 3.
For any 3 consecutive integers, one of the 3 will always be a multiple of 3. But we cannot confirm if n - 1 is a multiple of 3.
So, (1) is NOT SUFFICIENT.

(2) n^3 + 2n² + n = n(n² + 2n + 1) = n(n + 1)² is a multiple of 3.
So, either n or (n + 1) is a multiple of 3. And if n or n + 1 is a multiple of 3, then (n - 1) cannot be a multiple of 3, which is SUFFICIENT to answer the questions asked.

The correct answer is B.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by alltimeacheiver » Mon Apr 18, 2011 8:28 pm
sir thanks for the reply. but still not clear..Lets take numbers like n=3 so n(n+1)(n+1)= 3(4)(4)= 16*3= 48, which is multiple of 3 but if the number is n = 4 then n(n+1)(n+1)= 3(5)(5)= 25*3= 75= multiple of 3

Is it sounds nice with an example sir? Pls clarify
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Mon Apr 18, 2011 8:33 pm
alltimeacheiver wrote:sir thanks for the reply. but still not clear..Lets take numbers like n=3 so n(n+1)(n+1)= 3(4)(4)= 16*3= 48, which is multiple of 3 but if the number is n = 4 then n(n+1)(n+1)= 3(5)(5)= 25*3= 75= multiple of 3

Is it sounds nice with an example sir? Pls clarify
We have to find if n - 1 is a multiple of 3.

If n = 3, n(n+1)(n+1)= 3(4)(4)= 16*3 = 48. Here n - 1 = 3 - 1 = 2, not a multiple of 3.
Please note that we cannot take n = 4, as neither n nor n + 1 would be a multiple of 3, because if n = 4, then n(n+1)(n+1)= 4(5)(5)= 25*4 = 100, which is not a multiple of 3.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by alltimeacheiver » Tue Apr 19, 2011 10:43 pm
Pls clarify one thing again that n has to be in case above multiple of 3 which makes n-1 not multiple of 3. Ans to the statement would no and thus be the ans. pls confim
Join the discussion

by MAAJ » Wed Apr 20, 2011 3:48 pm
Note that statement (1) and (2) are very similar:

Statement (1)
(n - 1) n (n + 1), which are consecutive integers. So, (n - 1) n (n + 1) is a multiple of 3.
For any 3 consecutive integers, one of the 3 will always be a multiple of 3.

Statement (2)
n(n + 1)² = n (n + 1)(n + 1) is a multiple of 3. So, either n or (n + 1) is a multiple of 3.

From (n - 1) n (n + 1) we know that either n or (n + 1) is a multiple of 3. So the only one left is (n - 1) which will never be a multiple of 3, because the multiple of 3 will always lie (according to this statement) between n and (n + 1), and thus never in (n - 1). For example:

(2)*(3)*(4) = 24 (multiple of 3)
(1)*(2)*(3) = 6 (multiple of 3)

Hope it helps!
"There's a difference between interest and commitment. When you're interested in doing something, you do it only when circumstance permit. When you're committed to something, you accept no excuses, only results."
Join the discussion