BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Tough reminder question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:59 am
Mo2men wrote:If p, x, and y are positive integers, y is odd, and p = x^2 + y^2, is x divisible by 4?

(1) When p is divided by 8, the remainder is 5.
(2) x - y = 3
An odd integer can be expressed in the following form:
2k + 1.
Since y is odd, y = 2k + 1.

Statement 1:
In other words, p is 5 more than a multiple of 8:
p = 8a + 5.

Since p = x² + y² and p = 8a + 5, we get:
x² + y² = 8a + 5
x² + (2k+1)² = 8a + 5
x² + 4k² + 4k + 1 = 8a + 5
x² + 4k² + 4k = 8a + 4
x² = 8a + 4 - (4k²+4k)
x² = 4(2a+1) - 4k(k+1)
x² = 4[2a+1 - k(k+1)].

As shown above, 2a+1 = odd integer.
Since k(k+1) is the product of two consecutive integers, k(k+1) = even.
Thus, the resulting equation above implies the following:
x² = 4(odd - even)
x² = 4(odd)
x = 2(√odd)
x = 2(odd).

A multiple of 4 can be divided twice by 2.
Since x = 2(odd) CANNOT be divided twice by 2, x is NOT a multiple of 4.
SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2:
If x=4 and y=1, then x is a multiple of 4.
If x=5 and y=2, then x is NOT a multiple of 4.
INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Mo2men » Tue Sep 13, 2016 1:32 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
An odd integer can be expressed in the following form:
2k + 1.
Since y is odd, y = 2k + 1.

Statement 1:
In other words, p is 5 more than a multiple of 8:
p = 8a + 5.

Since p = x² + y² and p = 8a + 5, we get:
x² + y² = 8a + 5
Hi Mitch,

Thanks for your help

I have another solution for evaluating statement 1 based on plug in values carefully instead of using y=2k+1

x² + y² = 8a + 5
x² = 8a + 5 - y²

put y=1 & a = 1(odd number) x²= 4.....X= 2.............. Not divisible by 4

put y=1 & a = 2(even number) x²= 12.....X= 2 root 3...... Not divisible by 4

put y=3 & a = 3(odd number) x²= 20.....X= 2 root 10..... Not divisible by 4

put y=3 & a = 2(even number) x²= 12.....X= 2 root 3...... Not divisible by 4

put y=5 & a = 3(odd number) x²= 4.....X= 2.............. Not divisible by 4

We can conclude that a pattern will start to appear so Statement 1 is always 'NO'

sufficient.

Is my reasoning above valid??

Thanks
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Sep 13, 2016 5:23 am
Mo2men wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
An odd integer can be expressed in the following form:
2k + 1.
Since y is odd, y = 2k + 1.

Statement 1:
In other words, p is 5 more than a multiple of 8:
p = 8a + 5.

Since p = x² + y² and p = 8a + 5, we get:
x² + y² = 8a + 5
Hi Mitch,

Thanks for your help

I have another solution for evaluating statement 1 based on plug in values carefully instead of using y=2k+1

x² + y² = 8a + 5
x² = 8a + 5 - y²

put y=1 & a = 1(odd number) x²= 4.....X= 2.............. Not divisible by 4

put y=1 & a = 2(even number) x²= 12.....X= 2 root 3...... Not divisible by 4

put y=3 & a = 3(odd number) x²= 20.....X= 2 root 10..... Not divisible by 4

put y=3 & a = 2(even number) x²= 12.....X= 2 root 3...... Not divisible by 4


put y=5 & a = 3(odd number) x²= 4.....X= 2.............. Not divisible by 4

We can conclude that a pattern will start to appear so Statement 1 is always 'NO'

sufficient.

Is my reasoning above valid??

Thanks
Unfortunately, the three cases in red are not valid because x must be a positive integer.
The two cases in blue are valid, but they are insufficient to establish a pattern because x=2 in each case.
To establish a pattern, we need to find several different integer values for x that satisfy all of the constraints in the problem.

To test cases, make a list of options for perfect squares x² and y² and for 8a + 5:
x² and y²: 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100...
8a + 5: 5, 13, 21, 29, 37, 45, 53, 61, 69, 77, 85, 93, 101, 109...

Now look for pairs in the first list that sum to a value in the second list:
1+4 = 5, implying that y=1 and x=2.
1+36 = 37, implying that y=1 and x=6.
9+36 = 45, implying that y=3 and x=6.
9+100 = 109, implying that y=3 and x=10.
The resulting values for x are all even non-multiples of 4.
Thus, it does not seem possible for x to be a multiple of 4.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Sep 16, 2016 2:16 pm
Mo2men wrote: Since p = x² + y² and p = 8a + 5, we get:
x² + y² = 8a + 5
This is a nice idea, though. What you can do at this point is make y odd (= 2k + 1), then say

x² + (2k + 1)² = 8a + 5

x² + 4k² + 4k + 1 = 8a + 5

x² + 4k² + 4k = 8a + 4

x² = 8a + 4 - 4k² - 4k

Since x² = the sum of four multiples of 4, we know that x² is divisible by 4. Now let's suppose that x is a multiple of 4, that is that we can write x = 4z + 1, for some integer z. Plugging that in, we get

(4z + 1)² = 8a + 4 - 4k² - 4k

16z² + 8z + 1 = 8a + 4 - 4k² - 4k

or

Odd = Even

But that's impossible ... so x can't divide by 4, and we're done!
Join the discussion