1. m > 3z
m + z > 4z
We need to know whether z > 0. Insuff
2. m < 4z
m + z < 5z, Insufficient
Combined. z > 0 and m > 0. Sufficient.
is M+Z>0
This topic has expert replies
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
-
Testluv
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 539 times
- Followed by:164 members
- GMAT Score:800
We need to know whether m + z>0hpgmat wrote:is M+Z > 0?
A) m - 3z>0
B) 4Z-m >0
With inequalities, if you are dividing or multiplying by a negative you have to flip the inequality sign. But other than that you can treat inequalities the same way you would treat an equal sign. Here, we don't have to worry about division or multiplication.
Therefore, the first statement is just telling us that m>3z. This can happen with m and z both being negative or both positive. So, with the information in this statement, the answer to the question can be either yes or no: Insufficient.
Statement two: 4z>m. Similar reasoning. Insufficient.(when analyzing this statement, we can't refer to the information in the other statement).
Combo:
When the inequality arrows are poining in the same direction, we can add the inequalities.
m - 3z>0
+4z - m>0
________________
z>0
So z is positive. Statement one tells us that m>3z. The only way m can be greater than (three times) a positive number is if m is also positive.
If both m and z are positive, then definitely their sum m+z is positive.
Therefore, the answer to the question is yes, and the statements, although insufficient in isolation, are sufficient in combination.
Choose C.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
-
harshavardhanc
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 11:47 pm
- Location: India
- Thanked: 68 times
- GMAT Score:680
No subtraction. Reason: we do not know which one is greater.pkw209 wrote:Can you also subtract in this situation or can you only add?When the inequality arrows are pointing in the same direction, we can add the inequalities.
see this :
1) 3 > 0
2) 4 > 0
is (1) - (2) > 0 ?
But of course, their addition : 7, will also be greater than 0.
Regards,
Harsha
Harsha
-
Testluv
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 539 times
- Followed by:164 members
- GMAT Score:800
Harsha's correct.
Technically, we can subtract when the inequality arrows are pointing in opposite directions. However, there are many exceptions to this rule, so for the GMAT you're better off staying away from it. If the arrows are in opposite directions, you can divide (or multiply) one of the inequalities by negative one, which will flip the sign. Then, the arrows will point in the same direction, and you can add.
Technically, we can subtract when the inequality arrows are pointing in opposite directions. However, there are many exceptions to this rule, so for the GMAT you're better off staying away from it. If the arrows are in opposite directions, you can divide (or multiply) one of the inequalities by negative one, which will flip the sign. Then, the arrows will point in the same direction, and you can add.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
-
Testluv
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 539 times
- Followed by:164 members
- GMAT Score:800
We can also "connect" or "chain-up" multiple inequalities (providing there is at least one shared variable).
(1) tells us that m > 3z
(2) tells us that 4z > m
Thus: 4z > m > 3z
Thus: 4z > 3z
Thus: z is positive (4z's will be greater than 3 z's when z is positive; if z were negative, then 4 of them would be smaller than 3 of them; in other words, if z were negative, the inequality sign would be the other way around)
And because m > 3z, m is also positive.
(1) tells us that m > 3z
(2) tells us that 4z > m
Thus: 4z > m > 3z
Thus: 4z > 3z
Thus: z is positive (4z's will be greater than 3 z's when z is positive; if z were negative, then 4 of them would be smaller than 3 of them; in other words, if z were negative, the inequality sign would be the other way around)
And because m > 3z, m is also positive.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
-
pradeepkaushal9518
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pm
- Thanked: 33 times
- Followed by:5 members
m+z>0
A m-3z>0
b. 4z-m>0
a. m-3z doest not give anything that can prove m+z>0
b.4z-m>0 also doest not give any information
now combing a n b m-3z+4z-m>0
z>0
when z>0
and m>3z
so m>0
m+z>0
so C
A m-3z>0
b. 4z-m>0
a. m-3z doest not give anything that can prove m+z>0
b.4z-m>0 also doest not give any information
now combing a n b m-3z+4z-m>0
z>0
when z>0
and m>3z
so m>0
m+z>0
so C
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Target question: Is m + z > 0?hpgmat wrote:is m + z > 0?
A) m - 3z>0
B) 4z - m >0
Statement 1: m - 3z > 0
There are several sets of numbers that meet this condition. Here are two:
Case a: m = 4 and z = 1, in which case m + z is greater than 0
Case a: m = 4 and z = -10, in which case m + z is not greater than 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: 4z - m > 0
There are several sets of numbers that meet this condition. Here are two:
Case a: m = 1 and z = 4, in which case m + z is greater than 0
Case a: m = -10 and z = 1, in which case m + z is not greater than 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statements 1 and 2 combined:
Rearrange statement 1 to get: -3z + m > 0
Statement 2: 4z - m > 0
Multiply both sides of -3z + m > 0 by 5 to get: -15z + 5m > 0
Multiply both sides of 4z - m > 0 by 4 to get: 16z - 4m > 0
Since both inequality signs are facing the same direction, we can ADD the two green inequalities to get: z + m > 0
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT
Answer: C
Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
