BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A jury pool consists of 6 men and w women. If 2 jurors are s

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorAT » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:54 am
A jury pool consists of 6 men and w women. If 2 jurors are selected from the pool at random, is the probability that 2 men will be selected higher than the probability that 1 man and 1 woman will be selected?

(1) w ≥ 3
(2) w < 6

What's the best way to determine whether statement 1 is sufficient? Need any experts help please?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by mbawisdom » Sat Mar 10, 2018 7:54 am
ardz24 wrote:A jury pool consists of 6 men and w women. If 2 jurors are selected from the pool at random, is the probability that 2 men will be selected higher than the probability that 1 man and 1 woman will be selected?

(1) w ≥ 3
(2) w < 6

What's the best way to determine whether statement 1 is sufficient? Need any experts help please?
Hi ardz24! Great question, happy to help out. Interesting that you ask about the first statement but not the second. How did you solve the second part? Once you set up your equation for the probabilities you should take the same approach for each statement so am a bit confused as to how you can do 2 but not do 1. Let me know where you got to and if you still need help will be happy to show you how I would answer the question.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Mar 10, 2018 10:05 am
ardz24 wrote:A jury pool consists of 6 men and w women. If 2 jurors are selected from the pool at random, is the probability that 2 men will be selected higher than the probability that 1 man and 1 woman will be selected?

(1) w ≥ 3
(2) w < 6
Statement 1:
Case 1: w=3, for a total of 9 people (6 men and 3 women)
From the 6 men, the number of ways to choose 2 = 6C2 = (6*5)/(2*1) = 15.
From the 9 people, the number of ways to choose 1 man and 1 woman = (number of options for the 1 man)(number of options for the 1 woman) = 6*3 = 18.
Since the value in blue is GREATER than the value in red, P(1 man and 1 woman) > P(2 men), with the result that the answer to the question stem is NO.

If the number of women increases, then the value in blue will also increase, while the value in red will stay the same.
Thus -- in every case -- P(1 man and 1 woman) > P(2 men), with the result that the answer to the question stem is NO.
SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2:
Case 1 also satisfies Statement 2.
In Case 1, the answer to the question stem is NO.
Case 2: w=0
In this case, the jury pool is all MEN, so P(2 men) = 100% and P(1 man and 1 woman) = 0%.
Thus, the answer to the question stem is YES.
Since the answer is NO in Case 1 but YES in Case 2, INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Mar 12, 2018 7:25 am
A jury pool consists of 6 men and w women. If 2 jurors are selected from the pool at random, is the probability that 2 men will be selected higher than the probability that 1 man and 1 woman will be selected?

(1) w> 3

(2) w < 6
Target question: Is P(2 men) greater than P(1 man and 1 woman)?

Statement 1: w> 3
Let's see what happens if w = 3 (note: this is the best chance that P(2 men) will be greater than P(1 man and 1 woman)

P(2 men) = P(man selected 1st and man selected 2nd)
= (6/9)(5/8)
= 30/72

P(1 man and 1 woman) = P(man selected 1st and woman selected 2nd OR woman selected 1st and man selected 2nd)
= P(man selected 1st and woman selected 2nd) + P(woman selected 1st and man selected 2nd)
= (6/9)(3/8) + (3/9)(6/8)
= 18/72 + 18/72
= 36/72

So, when w = 3, P(2 men) is not greater than P(1 man and 1 woman)

IMPORTANT: Now that we've shown that P(2 men) is not greater than P(1 man and 1 woman) when w = 3, we can see that, as the value of w increases, the answer to the target question will always remain the same.

As such, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: w < 6
Consider these two conflicting cases:

Case a: w = 1
P(2 men) = (6/7)(5/6)
= 30/42

P(1 man and 1 woman) = P(man selected 1st and woman selected 2nd OR woman selected 1st and man selected 2nd)
= P(man selected 1st and woman selected 2nd) + P(woman selected 1st and man selected 2nd)
= (6/7)(1/6) + (1/6)(6/7)
= 6/42 + 6/42
= 12/42

So, when w = 1, P(2 men) is greater than P(1 man and 1 woman)

Case b: w = 3
In statement 1, we already showed that, when w = 3, P(2 men) is not greater than P(1 man and 1 woman)

Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer = A

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion