If x > 0, is √x > x ?

This topic has expert replies
Moderator
Posts: 2058
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2017 4:24 am
Thanked: 1 times
Followed by:5 members

If x > 0, is √x > x ?

by M7MBA » Sun Jan 07, 2018 11:11 am
If x > 0, is √x > x ?

(1) x does not equal 1
(2) x*√x > x^2

The OA is the option B.

Why is not sufficient the statement (1)? I am confused here. Experts, can you help me?
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3008
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2016 6:19 am
Location: Grand Central / New York
Thanked: 470 times
Followed by:34 members

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Mon Jan 08, 2018 3:22 am
M7MBA wrote:If x > 0, is √x > x ?

(1) x does not equal 1
(2) x*√x > x^2

The OA is the option B.

Why is not sufficient the statement (1)? I am confused here. Experts, can you help me?
We have to find out whether x > 0, then is √x > x.

There are three cases.

Case 1: If 0 < x < 1

Say x = 1/4, then √x > x => √(1/4) ? 1/4 => 1/2 > 1/4. The answer is Yes.

Note that √x is a positive number.

Case 2: If x = 1

√x > x => √1 = 1 => 1 = 1. The answer is No.

Case 3: If x > 1

Say x = 4, then √x > x => √4 ? 4 => 2 < 4. The answer is No.

So, if 0 < x < 1, the answer is Yes, else No.

(1) x does not equal 1.

Insufficient. Case 1 and Case 3 are applicable in this case.

(2) x*√x > x^2

=> x*(x)^(1/2) > x^2 => x^(1+1/2) > x^2 => x^(3/2) > x^2 => 1 > x^2 / x^(3/2) => 1 > x^(2 - 3/2) => 1 > x^(1/2)

Squaring both the sides, we get 1 > x. Only Case 3 is applicable, thus the answer is No. Sufficient.

The correct answer: B

Hope this helps!

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep

Locations: Beijing | Copenhagen | Oslo | Lisbon | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.