A store sold 6 bicycles with an average sale price of $1,000

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Sep 03, 2018 5:19 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

BTGmoderatorDC wrote:A store sold 6 bicycles with an average sale price of $1,000. What was the price of the most expensive bicycle?

(1) The median price was $1,000.
(2) The range of prices was $600.
Target question: What was the price of the most expensive bicycle?

Given: The store sold 6 bicycles with an average sale price of $1,000.
This means the SUM of the 6 bikes = $6000 (since $6000/6 bikes = $1000 average)

Statement 1: The median price was $1,000.
This statement doesn't FEEL sufficient, so I'll TEST some values.
There are several scenarios that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: the prices are {1000, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000} in which case the most expensive bike is $1000
Case b: the prices are {900, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1100} in which case the most expensive bike is $1100
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Aside: For more on this idea of plugging in values when a statement doesn't feel sufficient, you can read my article: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/articles/dat ... lug-values

Statement 2: The range of prices was $600
This statement doesn't FEEL sufficient, so I'll TEST some values.
There are several scenarios that satisfy statement 2. Here are two:
Case a: the prices are {700, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1300} in which case the most expensive bike is $1300
Case b: the prices are {600, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1200, 1200} in which case the most expensive bike is $1200
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
There are STILL several scenarios that satisfy BOTH statements. Here are two:
Case a: the prices are {700, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1300} in which case the most expensive bike is $1300
Case b: the prices are {600, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1200, 1200} in which case the most expensive bike is $1200

Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: E

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3008
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2016 6:19 am
Location: Grand Central / New York
Thanked: 470 times
Followed by:34 members

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Tue Sep 04, 2018 12:56 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

BTGmoderatorDC wrote:A store sold 6 bicycles with an average sale price of $1,000. What was the price of the most expensive bicycle?

(1) The median price was $1,000.
(2) The range of prices was $600.

OA E

Source: Veritas Prep
Given that the store sold 6 bicycles with an average sale price of $1,000, the total price of the 6 bicycles were $6000.

Let's take each statement one by one.

(1) The median price was $1,000.

Certainly insufficient. It only states that the average of the prices of the 3rd and the 4th bicycle is $1000.

(2) The range of prices was $600.

Certainly insufficient. It only states that the difference in prices of the cheapest bicycle and the most expensive bicycle is $600.

(1) and (2) together

Let's take two cases.

1. Say the price of the cheapest bicycle is $x, thus, the price of the most expensive bicycle would be $(x + 600). And the prices other 4 bicycles is $1000, each.

Thus, the prices in an ascending order is x, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000, (x + 600)

Since x + 1000 + 1000+ 1000 + 1000 + (x + 600) = 6000

=> x = $700

Thus, the price of the most exp. bike = x + 600 = 700 + 600 = 1300

2. Say the price of the cheapest bicycle is $x, thus, the price of the most expensive bicycle would be $(x + 600). And the price of the 2nd bike is also $x, and the prices other 3 bicycles is $1000, each.

Thus, the prices in an ascending order are x, x, 1000, 1000, 1000, (x + 600)

Since x + x + 1000+ 1000 + 1000 + (x + 600) = 6000

=> x = $800

Thus, the price of the most exp. bike = x + 600 = 800 + 600 = 1400

No unique answer. Insufficient.

The correct answer: E

Hope this helps!

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review

Locations: Manhattan Review Begumpet | GMAT Prep Visakhapatnam | GRE Prep Warangal | Dilsukhnagar GRE Coaching | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.