What is the median (GMAT PREP 1)

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 7:27 am
Thanked: 48 times
Followed by:16 members

What is the median (GMAT PREP 1)

by alex.gellatly » Sun Sep 09, 2012 12:15 am
If 0<x<1, what is the median of the values x, x^-1, x^2, squareroot(x), and x^3?

x
x^-1
x^2
squareroot(x)
x^3

I figured it out after the test, but got it wrong originally. Just throwing it out for conversation..
A useful website I found that has every quant OG video explanation:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/useful-websi ... tml#475231

User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1060
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 6:46 am
Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands
Thanked: 318 times
Followed by:52 members

by neelgandham » Sun Sep 09, 2012 1:25 am
easiest way is to plug in.
Let x = 1/4, then
x = 1/4
x^-1 = 4
x^-2 = 16
√x = 1/2
x^3 = 1/64

So, 1/64,1/4,1/2,4,16 are in ascending order. i.e x^3 < x < √x < 1/x < 1/(x^2). So the median is [spoiler]√x[/spoiler].

IMO D
Anil Gandham
Welcome to BEATtheGMAT | Photography | Getting Started | BTG Community rules | MBA Watch
Check out GMAT Prep Now's online course at https://www.gmatprepnow.com/

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 10:10 pm
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

by everything's eventual » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:21 pm
As x is a fraction, the the more times you multiply the number by itself the smaller it gets.

Therefore the smallest number will be x^3 and then the next smallest is x ^ 2. The largest number will be x ^ -1 as this will be a real number greater than 1.

So we have the following till now in ascending order : x^3 , x^2 , _ , _ , x^-1

squareroot (x) > x ( as x is a fraction, the squareroot will be greater than the number itself)

So we finally have the following :

x^3 , x^2 , x , sqrrt (x) , x ^-1

So the median is x

Above is the logical way of doing it. We can ofcourse use neelgandham's method of plugging-in values as it is a much quicker option. The only mistake in my humble opinion was that neelgandham has considered x ^ -2 whereas the problem states x ^2.