Numbers-Integers, Prime!

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:4 members

Numbers-Integers, Prime!

by anirudhbhalotia » Mon Dec 06, 2010 7:28 pm
Which of the following is equal to the least positive integer that is divisible by each of the integers 4 through 10, inclusive?

(A) (2^3)(3^2)(5)(7)

(B) (2^3)(3^3)(5^2)(7)

(C) (2^4)(3^3)(5)(7)

(D) (2^5)(3^2)(5)(7)

(E) (2^6)(3^3)(5^2)(7)


[spoiler]I am surprised how many of PS problems, all relate to Prime numbers/factorization!

Answer: A
To find the least common multiple of several numbers, start by finding the prime factorization of each number:

4 = 2^2
5 = 5
6 = 2 x 3
7 = 7
8 = 2^3
9 = 3^2
10 = 2 x 5

The least common multiple will contain every prime factor, so there must be a 2, a 3, a 5, and a 7 in the result. To find the exponent, look for the largest exponent among the factorizations. For instance, there is a 2 in the factorizations of 4, 6, 8, and 10. The largest exponent is 2^3, the factorization of 8. Thus, the least common multiple will contain 2^3. That limits our choices to (A) and (B).

The largest exponent of 3 is 3^2, in 9. The only exponents of 5 and 7 are 1, so the answer we're looking for is (A), (2^3)(3^2)(5)(7).v[/spoiler]
Source: — Problem Solving |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 358
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 9:47 am
Location: Mumbai
Thanked: 34 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:740

by karanrulz4ever » Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:57 am
Just by some quick calculations in mind and comparing the options, you can get to A.

Did you not understand the explanation you posted?

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:4 members

by anirudhbhalotia » Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:05 am
karanrulz4ever wrote:Just by some quick calculations in mind and comparing the options, you can get to A.

Did you not understand the explanation you posted?
No no...I did understand. I posted it here just because I thought the explanation was quite good and could help others in understanding the concept.

Besides, who doesn't need an extra problem to solve? ;-)