BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Circles and Triangles

Expert replies
by anuptvm » Wed Dec 29, 2010 5:19 am
Which of the following lists the number of points at which a circle can intersect a triangle?

A. 2 and 6 only

B. 2, 4, and 6 only

C. 1, 2, 3, and 6 only

D. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 only

E. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 only

My choice was B the OA is E

Could someone explain !
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by anshumishra » Wed Dec 29, 2010 5:36 am
anuptvm wrote:Which of the following lists the number of points at which a circle can intersect a triangle?

A. 2 and 6 only

B. 2, 4, and 6 only

C. 1, 2, 3, and 6 only

D. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 only

E. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 only

My choice was B the OA is E

Could someone explain !
Answer is E.
One side of triangle can intersect the circle on two points (draw a chord and extend it as the side of the triangle and you will see) or touch the circle at one point if the side tangentially touches the circle or zero points otherwise.

There are a total of 3 sides, so it can intersect the circle on 1,2,3,4,5 and 6 points.
Let me show a few ->
1 point -> 1 side tangent , other side don't touch
2 points -> (1 side as extending chord, other sides don't touch) OR (Two sides as tangent and third side don't touch circle)
...........
...........

Hope that makes it clear.
Thanks
Anshu

(Every mistake is a lesson learned )
Join the discussion

by anuptvm » Wed Dec 29, 2010 5:38 am
anshumishra wrote:
Answer is E.
One side of triangle can intersect the circle on two points (draw a chord and extend it as the side of the triangle and you will see) or touch the circle at one point if the side tangentially touches the circle or zero points otherwise.

There are a total of 3 sides, so it can intersect the circle on 1,2,3,4,5 and 6 points.
Let me show a few ->
1 point -> 1 side tangent , other side don't touch
2 points -> (1 side as extending chord, other sides don't touch) OR (Two sides as tangent and third side don't touch circle)
...........
...........

Hope that makes it clear.
Okay, but isn't intersection and touching the circle different? I counted only those scenarios were the side of the triangel cuts thru the circle ( 2 distinct points for each side)
Join the discussion

by anshumishra » Wed Dec 29, 2010 5:40 am
anuptvm wrote:
anshumishra wrote:
Answer is E.
One side of triangle can intersect the circle on two points (draw a chord and extend it as the side of the triangle and you will see) or touch the circle at one point if the side tangentially touches the circle or zero points otherwise.

There are a total of 3 sides, so it can intersect the circle on 1,2,3,4,5 and 6 points.
Let me show a few ->
1 point -> 1 side tangent , other side don't touch
2 points -> (1 side as extending chord, other sides don't touch) OR (Two sides as tangent and third side don't touch circle)
...........
...........

Hope that makes it clear.
Okay, but isn't intersection and touching the circle different? I counted only those scenarios were the side of the triangel cuts thru the circle ( 2 distinct points for each side)
No, touching means 1 point of intersection.
Thanks
Anshu

(Every mistake is a lesson learned )
Join the discussion

by captcha » Wed Dec 29, 2010 6:16 am
IMO E
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Wed Dec 29, 2010 6:30 am
Hi there,

Anshu is correct: we are looking for 1 point in the intersection and that is THE SAME as AT LEAST 1 point in the intersection.

Please note that in Math the opposite (=negation) of "one ...." is "NONE ..." , therefore we were looking for cases (geometric scenarios) in which the intersection asked is non-empty, that is, in which there is (at least) one point in common to the circle and to the triangle.

Changing subject, IMHO people should not post "IMO ..." (at least) after the complete (potential) solution was presented... for 2 reasons:

(1) It is not a matter of opinion... we are discussing MATH here, not some pseudo-science theme...

(2) If someone

(a) thinks there is a flaw in another guy´s reasoning, please show it or ask about it ;
(b) did not understand another guy´s argument, please ask for more details.

If we respect that, the posts will be much more useful, don´t you all agree?

Regards to all, especially to captcha (no pun intended above, really)!
Fabio.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion

by anshumishra » Wed Dec 29, 2010 6:38 am
fskilnik wrote:Hi there,

Anshu is correct: we are looking for 1 point in the intersection and that is THE SAME as AT LEAST 1 point in the intersection.

Please note that in Math the opposite (=negation) of "one ...." is "NONE ..." , therefore we were looking for cases (geometric scenarios) in which the intersection asked is non-empty, that is, in which there is (at least) one point in common to the circle and to the triangle.

Changing subject, IMHO people should not post "IMO ..." (at least) after the complete (potential) solution was presented... for 2 reasons:

(1) It is not a matter of opinion... we are discussing MATH here, not some pseudo-science theme...

(2) If someone

(a) thinks there is a flaw in another guy´s reasoning, please show it or ask about it ;
(b) did not understand another guy´s argument, please ask for more details.

If we respect that, the posts will be much more useful, don´t you all agree?

Regards to all, especially to captcha (no pun intended above, really)!
Fabio.
Thanks fsklink,

I can't agree with you more.
The only exception is when we are parallely working on a problem independently and post the solution within a few minutes interval. Then even if the answer and method match ( so in essence the solution doesn't add anything new) , no one can change that and we should live with that.
Thanks
Anshu

(Every mistake is a lesson learned )
Join the discussion

by fskilnik@GMATH » Wed Dec 29, 2010 6:45 am
anshumishra wrote:The only exception is when we are parallely working on a problem independently and post the solution within a few minutes interval. Then even if the answer and method match ( so in essence the solution doesn't add anything new) , no one can change that and we should live with that.
Agreed, sure. Important: I have no authority nor the will to put people unconfortable... I just believe we should try to use arguments... it´s not voting, it´s solving/discussing problems, that´s all!

Cheers,
Fabio.
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator ( Math for the GMAT)
English-speakers :: https://www.gmath.net
Portuguese-speakers :: https://www.gmath.com.br
Join the discussion