Princeton Cracking the GMAT, Question 21 in Math BIN 4. I think this is where mnjoosub got this question.
The book gives the formula for Cubbys Weight as C= p/4 +A
SO basically, Princeton review put this question in the wrong section, definately should have gone in the Verbal section of the book as a Sentence Correction problem, being that it cleary states Brian AND Cubby...
Weight problem
-
mnjoosub
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:32 pm
- Location: Mauritius
- Thanked: 2 times
Hi Friends,
I am back after some break.
The question is from Princeton Bin 4- No 21.
The question seem confusing at first, but after analysis, we can notice that the verb 'weights' goes with Cubby but not Brian and Andrea (More of a SC question than PS
).
So, C=A+(p/4).
I made the same mistake at first and did not get the answer.
I put this question on the forum just to boost some thinking.
Conclusion:
Whether Maths or Verbal be cautious with wording :!: :roll:
I am back after some break.
The question is from Princeton Bin 4- No 21.
The question seem confusing at first, but after analysis, we can notice that the verb 'weights' goes with Cubby but not Brian and Andrea (More of a SC question than PS
So, C=A+(p/4).
I made the same mistake at first and did not get the answer.
I put this question on the forum just to boost some thinking.
Conclusion:
Whether Maths or Verbal be cautious with wording :!: :roll:
-
GMAT_KE_MA_KI
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 2:59 pm
Just the fact the B+C=p/4 + A does not work for any of the answers .. resovles the mystry of the word smithy .. (Brian and Andrea's) dog .. or Brian and (Andrea's dog ..)
I think C= p/4 + A is logical in this case .. given the choices.
;p
I think C= p/4 + A is logical in this case .. given the choices.
;p
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
The problem seems to be with interpretation of the information, in particular the phrase:mnjoosub wrote:Together, Andrea and Brian weigh p pounds; Brian weighs 10 pounds more than Andrea. Brian and Andrea's dog, Cubby, weighs p/4 pounds more than Andrea. In terms of p, What is Cubby's weight in pounds?
(A) (p/2)-10
(b) (3p/4)-5
(c) (3p/2)-5
(d) (5p/4)-10
(e) (5p)-5
The OA is B.
I can get the answer by plugging, but I would like to have the mathematical explanation.
Thanks.
Most people are interpreting this as "the sum of Brian and Andrea's dog is p/4 pounds more than Andrea".Brian and Andrea's dog, Cubby, weighs p/4 pounds more than Andrea.
However, when I first read it, I interpreted it as "the dog belonging to Brian and Andrea weighs p/4 pounds more than Andrea does".
I'm 100% certain that my interpretation is correct (and not just by reverse engineering the question from the answer).
We have to remember that math questions will be gramatically correct. Let's look at the verb in the sentence.
"Weighs" is a singular verb. In order for the first interpretation to be right, the sentence would have had to read:
since "Brian and Cubby" form a plural noun and require a plural verb.Brian and Andrea's dog, Cubby, WEIGH p/4 pounds more than Andrea
So, now that we know how to interpret the question, our equations are:
A + B = P
B = A + 10
C = A + P/4
We want to solve for C, so let's get rid of A and B by getting A in terms of P and then subbing into the Cubby equation:
A + 10 = B
A + A + 10 = P
2A = P - 10
A = P/2 - 5
C = P/2 - 5 + P/4
C = (2P/4) + P/4 - 5
C = (2P + P)/4 - 5
C = 3P/4 - 5
Choose (b).

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course












