CR - Weakening assumption & Resolving paradox

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members
European green crabs are an invasive species which have recently colonized the Northwest coast of North America, among other places. They disrupt ecosystems and prey heavily on native shellfish. However, in Europe, the population of green crabs is kept relatively low by a parasitic barnacle called Sacculina carcini. This barnacle is hardy and could likely be introduced to areas where the European green crab threatens to ruin established ecosystems.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument that it would NOT be advisable to attempt to eliminate European green crabs from the Northwest coast of North America by introducing to the area the parasitic barnacle discussed above?


(A) In their native habitat, the parasites often threaten the elimination of local green crab populations.

(B) European green crabs are also occasionally preyed upon by fishes, gulls and other species of crab in their native ecosystems.

(C) Though the parasite may survive in North American waters, no large-scale facility for breeding and harvesting the parasites exists as of yet.

(D) Many other invasive species on the Northwest coast of North America are not suitable hosts for this parasite.

(E) Though the barnacle cannot reproduce inside of native shore crabs, it can still infect and kill native shore crabs
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1239
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:25 am
Thanked: 233 times
Followed by:26 members
GMAT Score:680

by sam2304 » Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:21 pm
EGC invasive - disrupt ecosys, prey heavily
In europe they are kept low by a parasitic barnacle

Introduce these to areas where EGC threatens to ruin the eco system

Which would support that it is a wrong idea to send barcles to control EGC ?

Mixed between A and E. Both seem to strengthen the argument. What is the OA ?
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/

Legendary Member
Posts: 784
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
Thanked: 114 times
Followed by:12 members

by patanjali.purpose » Fri Jul 13, 2012 11:46 am
karthikpandian19 wrote:European green crabs are an invasive species which have recently colonized the Northwest coast of North America, among other places. They disrupt ecosystems and prey heavily on native shellfish. However, in Europe, the population of green crabs is kept relatively low by a parasitic barnacle called Sacculina carcini. This barnacle is hardy and could likely be introduced to areas where the European green crab threatens to ruin established ecosystems.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument that it would NOT be advisable to attempt to eliminate European green crabs from the Northwest coast of North America by introducing to the area the parasitic barnacle discussed above?
North America: GC affects ECOSYSTEMS AND EATS SF
Europe: SC (Sacculina carcini) kills GC
Conclusion: Introduce SC in North America

Author's Assumption: NO SIDE-EFFECTS OF SC in North America (no NEGATIVE impact ON ECOSYSTEMS AND Shellfish

We need to look for an answer that shows SIDE-EFFECTS of SC in North America

(A) In their native habitat, the parasites often threaten the elimination of local green crab populations.This STRENGTHENS the conclusion that SC indeed kills GC (does not show any side-effect)

(B) European green crabs are also occasionally preyed upon by fishes, gulls and other species of crab in their native ecosystems.Who preys GC is immaterial

(C) Though the parasite may survive in North American waters, no large-scale facility for breeding and harvesting the parasites exists as of yet.It tallks about issues in implementation of the plan (whether author will be able to put SC in North America) - not relevant

(D) Many other invasive species on the Northwest coast of North America are not suitable hosts for this parasite.Does not show any side-effects of SC in North America

(E) Though the barnacle cannot reproduce inside of native shore crabs, it can still infect and kill native shore crabsThis shows that if SC is put in North America, it will kill NATIVE SHORE CRABS (a kind of impact on ECOSYSTEM - key reason for looking for SC). This choice shows a negative effect of SC.

IMO E

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 110
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:28 pm
Location: India
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:1 members

by spartacus1412 » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:59 pm
IMO B
It states that if the parasite is introduced the crabs will be infected so other species that feed on them will be infected.

OA plz
Its do or die this time!
Practise, practise and practise.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1239
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:25 am
Thanked: 233 times
Followed by:26 members
GMAT Score:680

by sam2304 » Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:11 pm
spartacus1412 wrote:IMO B
It states that if the parasite is introduced the crabs will be infected so other species that feed on them will be infected.

OA plz
B is not a direct answer which affects the argument. This involves necessary additional assumption that whatever way the EGC are controlled, they would be spread to other species that consume EGC and affect them.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:56 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by swg » Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:02 am
IMO, D should b the ans.
Issue is - that why it would NOT be advisable to attempt to eliminate the crabs from the Northwest coast of North America by introducing the parasitic barnacle to the area?

Ans choice shud tell us some way why the introduction of the parasite will not work - D does that.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 462
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:08 pm
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:4 members

by confuse mind » Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:02 pm
Confused a lot on this one.

IMO - E
This is because in E 'native' means North American and if they can kill the native organisms then the ecosystem will be disrupted even further.

In A native means native of parasite which is irrelevant
in B native means native of European crab which becomes irrelevant

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

by karthikpandian19 » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:15 pm
GMAT expert ..... pls clarify on this one
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

by karthikpandian19 » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:21 pm
OA is E
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

by karthikpandian19 » Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:22 pm
This argument describes a European crab that is invading North American coastal waters. It notes that a parasite controls the populations of such crabs in Europe and suggests the parasite could be introduced to control invasive populations in North America.

We are asked to find a reason why it would not be a good idea to introduce this parasite. The correct answer should provide some reason why the parasite would be ineffective at controlling the crab population, or provide some undesirable, unconsidered effect of introducing the parasite.

Choice E notes that the parasite can "infect and kill" native shore crabs. The parasite is being introduced to protect native species; if, instead, the parasite kills them, the native ecosystem is not protected. Choice E is correct.

Choice A: Opposite. This choice states that the parasites often "threaten the elimination" of local crab populations in Europe. Such a statement suggests that the parasite would be highly effective in destroying the invasive green crabs in North America. This choice argues for, not against, introducing the parasite.

Choice B: Irrelevant. This choice states that other predators also control the population of green crabs in Europe. This might suggest that parasites alone may be less effective at controlling the green crabs than parasites AND other predators, but it does not demonstrate that parasites alone would not lower the crab population.

Choice C states a logistical obstacle to the plan; there is not currently a facility which can breed large numbers of the parasite. While this may make the plan difficult to execute, it does not mean the plan is not advisable.

Choice D: Irrelevant. This choice suggests that other invasive species would not be affected by the parasite. This has no bearing on whether the parasite would control the population of green crabs.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 3:09 am
Thanked: 2 times

by akashkumar1987 » Tue Oct 09, 2012 8:46 pm
I think the answer will be D

Answer will be something like which says below points
1) Barnacle s harmful to other species also
2) Or it gives some condition that exist in north america and not in Europe

In D we are showing that the "other invasive species" will also be affected by the parasite.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

by karthikpandian19 » Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:35 pm
Look into the argument, it emphasizes on "ecosystems" in the first para last sentence.

This clearly effects to answer E, as it kills native crabs and ruins ecosystem
akashkumar1987 wrote:I think the answer will be D

Answer will be something like which says below points
1) Barnacle s harmful to other species also
2) Or it gives some condition that exist in north america and not in Europe

In D we are showing that the "other invasive species" will also be affected by the parasite.
Regards,
Karthik
The source of the questions that i post from JUNE 2013 is from KNEWTON

---If you find my post useful, click "Thank" :) :)---
---Never stop until cracking GMAT---

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 2:27 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by Sapana » Sat Jan 05, 2013 8:21 pm
Good Question.. Thanx karthik.. I have an observation (which might be false).. The CR passages which has a lot of names involved (specially the confusing ones) the correct answer choices are usually placed towards the end (D or E).. I think it might be good idea to start from E when you have a lot of names..