I remember from my Knewton course the instructors saying that the answer to an inference question on in the CR section (or reading comp. for that matter) will always be something that MUST be true. Is that the case? I'm now using the Economist course, and there was a practice question that went something along the lines of "Billy has been late to work this month 4 times, doesn't get along well with his co-workers, and recently made an error costing the company $10,000. What can be inferred?"
The correct answer ended up being "It's unlikely that Billy will be promoted." Yes, that certainly makes sense, and one would definitely think that per that set of facts it is indeed unlikely that Billy will be promoted - BUT, it is definitely not for SURE.
My question is - whenever you need to infer something on the GMAT, must it be 100% fact based on the text?
Thank you.
Edit: It appears I've posted this in the wrong place. My apologies.
The correct answer ended up being "It's unlikely that Billy will be promoted." Yes, that certainly makes sense, and one would definitely think that per that set of facts it is indeed unlikely that Billy will be promoted - BUT, it is definitely not for SURE.
My question is - whenever you need to infer something on the GMAT, must it be 100% fact based on the text?
Thank you.
Edit: It appears I've posted this in the wrong place. My apologies.


















