BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

interest rates

Expert replies
by FINALCOUNTDOWN » Wed Jan 21, 2009 1:20 am
Ronald: According to my analysis of the national economy, housing prices should not increase during the next six months unless interest rates drop significantly.
Mark: I disagree. One year ago, when interest rates last fell significantly, housing prices did not increase at all.
It can be inferred from the conversation above that Mark has interpreted Ronald’s statement to mean that
(A) housing prices will rise only if interest rates fall
(B) if interest rates fall, housing prices must rise
(C) interest rates and housing prices tend to rise and fall together
(D) interest rates are the only significant economic factor affecting housing prices
(E) interest rates are likely to fall significantly in the next six months
B
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by bmlaud » Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:06 am
B and D are the contenders, I will go with D.
Join the discussion

by amitabhprasad » Wed Jan 21, 2009 7:42 am
My pick will be "D" as well.
Not sure how OA could be "B" when premise is clearly talking about significant interest drop ???
Join the discussion

by sacx » Wed Jan 21, 2009 8:37 am
IMO B

the stem is 'what Mark is interpreting from Ronald's statement'. Per Ronald if the interest rates go down, house prices go up

D. it would have been the correct answer if the stem was 'what can be inferred from this conversation'
SACX
Join the discussion

by amitabhprasad » Wed Jan 21, 2009 8:54 am
sacx wrote:IMO B

the stem is 'what Mark is interpreting from Ronald's statement'. Per Ronald if the interest rates go down, house prices go up

D. it would have been the correct answer if the stem was 'what can be inferred from this conversation'
Isn't Mark also talking about significant interest rate drop ? not just drop in interest rate ?
Join the discussion

by vcbabu » Wed Jan 21, 2009 8:56 am
B IT IS
Join the discussion

by krisraam » Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:37 pm
B.

I CAN'T THINK HOW I COULD BE "D"
Join the discussion

by amitabhprasad » Wed Jan 21, 2009 3:42 pm
krisraam wrote:B.

I CAN'T THINK HOW I COULD BE "D"
I believe premise states if interest rates falls significantly then house price must rise
But as per "B" for any drop in interest rates housing price must fall. I am unable to justify this
Any other view ?
Join the discussion

by krisraam » Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:17 pm
Well. B is close. Even I felt the same as you
Join the discussion

by awesomeusername » Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:20 pm
I'm with B too.
Join the discussion

by amitabhprasad » Wed Jan 21, 2009 10:15 pm
Unless we know the source.
IMO we shouldn't take OA for granted.
And I am finding hard to justify "B"
Join the discussion

by FINALCOUNTDOWN » Wed Jan 21, 2009 10:21 pm
amitabhprasad wrote:Unless we know the source.
IMO we shouldn't take OA for granted.
And I am finding hard to justify "B"
altough i was also with D but on close reading i observed that D only states that "the interest rates affects the housing prices"but it does'nt states whether the housing prices will fall or rise, so in that case B gives more clear picture...

any objections to my logic are welcomed.
Join the discussion

by techwiz » Thu Jan 22, 2009 7:08 pm
I am with B
Sucess is near, keep working!

https://www.techwizclub.info/
Join the discussion

by bec.amit » Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:53 pm
I would prefer B as well.
D is too far fetched!!
Join the discussion

by bravotalks » Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:54 pm
I'm with B too
Join the discussion