OG-11. 1st edition (Purple) 27

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:24 pm
Thanked: 1 times

OG-11. 1st edition (Purple) 27

by rishijhawar » Mon Jun 27, 2011 10:28 am
Editorial: The mayor plans to deactivate the city's fire alarm boxes, because most calls received from them are false alarms. The mayor claims that the alarm boxes are no longer necessary, since
most people now have access to either public or private telephone. But the city's commercial
district, where there is the greatest risk of fire, has few residents and few public telephones, so
some alarm boxes are still necessary.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial's argument?
a) Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs the city more than five million dollars annually.
b) Commercial buildings have automatic fire alarm systems that are linked directly to the fire department
c) The fire department gets less information from an alarm box than it does from a telephone call.
d) The city's fire department is located much closer to the residential areas than to the commercial district.
e) On average, almost 25 percent of the public telephones in the city are out of order.
OA. B.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 am
Thanked: 105 times
Followed by:14 members

by vikram4689 » Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:57 pm
When fire is reported directly then there is NO NEED to fire alarm boxes. Therefore B.
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 9:09 am
Location: pune
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:3 members

by amit2k9 » Tue Jun 28, 2011 10:56 pm
B gives the alternate reason and hence the OA.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:24 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by rishijhawar » Mon Jul 04, 2011 8:23 pm
Amit, can you please expand your point. thx

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:20 pm
How do we know that a fire alarm system is different from a fire alarm box . )
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:34 am
Thanked: 38 times
Followed by:1 members

by sl750 » Tue Jul 05, 2011 4:26 am
Answer choice B weakens the conclusion of the editorial's argument that some fire alarm boxes are necessary by stating that Commercial buildings have automatic fire alarm systems that are linked directly to the fire department thereby making those alarm boxes redundant

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:24 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by rishijhawar » Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:15 am
sl750, thanks. Before we hear back from Amit, can i request you to explain how B gives the alternate reason, in case you know.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:31 am
rishijhawar wrote:sl750, thanks. Before we hear back from Amit, can i request you to explain how B gives the alternate reason, in case you know.
knowing that there is something called alarm systems that are privately sponsored and different from the alarm boxes mentioned in the stimulus is the key to this cr .
I Seek Explanations Not Answers