Doesnt C imply that the insufficient amount of energy was trying to evaporate the water , but the energy was prevented from doing so .atulmangal wrote:Thought to share the given official explanation:
The original sentence incorrectly uses the verb evaporating, which cannot take a direct object; a subject, here water, can evaporate, but a subject cannot evaporate something else. In the original version of this sentence, evaporating its molecules is not a grammatical use of evaporating.
Additionally, as a result of is an adverbial phrase that does not grammatically describe a verb within the sentence. Prevented... as a result of is not an acceptable construction.
Choice C fixes these errors without introducing new ones. The subject water is prevented from evaporating, and evaporating does not incorrectly take an object. The preposition by grammatically corresponds with the verb prevented. The water is prevented from evaporating... by an insufficient level... The pronoun its clearly refers to water.
Choice D retains the ungrammatical as a result of. The use of being is awkward.
Choice E is illogical; the water is not actively preventing its molecules...
The correct answer choice is C.
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
















