BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

it is chocolate flavored

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3650
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
Location: India
Thanked: 267 times
Followed by:80 members
GMAT Score:760

it is chocolate flavored

by sanju09 » Fri Jul 30, 2010 4:30 am
When a cookie is taken at random from a jar, what is the probability that it is chocolate flavored?

1. There are twice as many chocolate flavored cookies as there are almond flavored cookies in the jar.
2. One third of the cookies in the jar are almond flavored.

[spoiler]Source: majortests.com[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Top
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1460
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:28 am
Thanked: 135 times
Followed by:7 members

by selango » Fri Jul 30, 2010 4:46 am
P(CHOC)=Choc/Total

stmt1,

2C=A

We dont know about other flavours info and total values.

Insuff

stmt2,

1/3*x=A

We dont know about other flavours ratios.

Insuff

Combining 1 and 2,

C=2A

A=1/3*x,C=2/3*x

Prob(CHOC)=2/3x/(1/3x+2/3x)=2/3

Suff

Pick C
--Anand--
Top
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:48 am

by santoostar » Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:31 am
there could be cookies other than almond and chocolate flavour. its no where explictly mentioned that the jar contains only 2 type of cookies...can some one help me with this please!! could be a simple one...but i feel this understanding will help on DS to a great extent.

Thanx in advance.
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Wed Aug 11, 2010 3:34 am
santoostar wrote:there could be cookies other than almond and chocolate flavour. its no where explictly mentioned that the jar contains only 2 type of cookies...can some one help me with this please!! could be a simple one...but i feel this understanding will help on DS to a great extent.

Thanx in advance.
actually, this statement is incorrect in two different ways.

(1)
ironically, we DO know that there are no other cookies -- precisely because the authors of this question have chosen the only fractions for which we can figure this out.
specifically, if you combine the two statements, you get 1/3 almond and 2/3 chocolate. since 1/3 + 2/3 = 1 = all the cookies in the jar, you know that there cannot be any other varieties of cookies in the jar.

(2)
even if it were possible to have other kinds of cookies in the jar -- e.g., let's say that the jar contains 1/7 almond and 2/7 chocolate cookies, so that the other 4/7 of the cookies in the jar are of mystery flavors -- it still doesn't matter, since all we care about is the fraction of chocolate cookies. in this hypothetical case, that fraction would be 2/7.
takeaway:
in data sufficiency, you are NOT concerned with finding every single quantity in the problem. you are only concerned with finding the ONE quantity for which you are actually ASKED!
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Top
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:48 am

by santoostar » Wed Aug 11, 2010 6:54 am
lunarpower wrote:
santoostar wrote:there could be cookies other than almond and chocolate flavour. its no where explictly mentioned that the jar contains only 2 type of cookies...can some one help me with this please!! could be a simple one...but i feel this understanding will help on DS to a great extent.

Thanx in advance.
actually, this statement is incorrect in two different ways.

(1)
ironically, we DO know that there are no other cookies -- precisely because the authors of this question have chosen the only fractions for which we can figure this out.
specifically, if you combine the two statements, you get 1/3 almond and 2/3 chocolate. since 1/3 + 2/3 = 1 = all the cookies in the jar, you know that there cannot be any other varieties of cookies in the jar.

(2)
even if it were possible to have other kinds of cookies in the jar -- e.g., let's say that the jar contains 1/7 almond and 2/7 chocolate cookies, so that the other 4/7 of the cookies in the jar are of mystery flavors -- it still doesn't matter, since all we care about is the fraction of chocolate cookies. in this hypothetical case, that fraction would be 2/7.
takeaway:
in data sufficiency, you are NOT concerned with finding every single quantity in the problem. you are only concerned with finding the ONE quantity for which you are actually ASKED!
Thank you so much Ron for the explanation. It did clear my confusion.

Suppose we had the statement 1 andd 2 read

1. There are twice as many chocolate flavored cookies as there are almond flavored cookies in the jar.

2- One fifth of the cookies in the jar are almond flavored.

then, will the answer still be C?

My understanding says it would be E - correct me if i am wrong...( sorry if confused any1)..

Santo

Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Thu Aug 12, 2010 5:23 am
santoostar wrote:Suppose we had the statement 1 andd 2 read

1. There are twice as many chocolate flavored cookies as there are almond flavored cookies in the jar.

2- One fifth of the cookies in the jar are almond flavored.

then, will the answer still be C?

My understanding says it would be E - correct me if i am wrong...( sorry if confused any1)..

Santo

no, the answer would still be (c). in fact, this was exactly the point of my illustration above with 1/7 and 2/7; if you didn't read that part of my post, go back and check it out.

with your numbers here, if you have both of those statements together, the fraction of chocolate cookies in the jar is 2 x 1/5 = 2/5. sufficient.
in your instance, the jar contains 1/5 almond, 2/5 chocolate, and 2/5 mystery cookies that you have no idea what they are -- but you don't care. all you care about is the fraction of cookies that are chocolate, and you have that fraction.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Top
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:48 am

by santoostar » Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:12 am
lunarpower wrote:
santoostar wrote:Suppose we had the statement 1 andd 2 read

1. There are twice as many chocolate flavored cookies as there are almond flavored cookies in the jar.

2- One fifth of the cookies in the jar are almond flavored.

then, will the answer still be C?

My understanding says it would be E - correct me if i am wrong...( sorry if confused any1)..

Santo

no, the answer would still be (c). in fact, this was exactly the point of my illustration above with 1/7 and 2/7; if you didn't read that part of my post, go back and check it out.

with your numbers here, if you have both of those statements together, the fraction of chocolate cookies in the jar is 2 x 1/5 = 2/5. sufficient.
in your instance, the jar contains 1/5 almond, 2/5 chocolate, and 2/5 mystery cookies that you have no idea what they are -- but you don't care. all you care about is the fraction of cookies that are chocolate, and you have that fraction.
well..i see it now.....i was just concentrating on the total - thinking that would make a difference...thanks for helping me understand....

santo
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1