Heating Formula

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 7:24 pm

Heating Formula

by gmatwriter » Sat Feb 13, 2010 1:36 pm
Please Explain:

There are few things worse for a new parent than listening to a baby scream in hunger while a bottle of formula slowly warms up in a bowl of hot water. So why not just pop the bottle in the microwave and zap it in 20 seconds? Because microwave heat fluids unevenly, and a hot pocket in the formula could seriously injure the baby.

Which of the following is presupposed in the argument against heating formula in the microwave?

a. Babies generally refuse to eat formula that has been heated in a microwave.

b. Microwave radiation might break down some of the proteins in formula that are vital to a baby's health.

c. Different microwaves use different amounts of power and consequently some models could heat a bottle to scalding temperature faster than others.

d. Parents cannot be expected to consistently even out the temperature of a microwaved bottle by shaking it vigorously before giving it to the baby.

e. Once formula has been heated, any leftover formula should be discarded, because otherwise the formula could spoil between feedings and make the baby sick.

d
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2109
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:25 pm
Location: New Jersey
Thanked: 109 times
Followed by:79 members
GMAT Score:640

by money9111 » Sat Feb 13, 2010 6:26 pm
IMO D... gmatwriter what was your answer?

I had it down to C and D... I chose D because presupposed means assumed... so in the example given above... it's assumed that after the formula has been microwaved, that parents cannot shake it every time...

it doesn't mention anything of Different microwaves or models... C basically reaffirms the last sentence "Because microwave heat fluids unevenly, and a hot pocket in the formula could seriously injure the baby. "
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants


Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 7:24 pm

by gmatwriter » Sat Feb 13, 2010 9:47 pm
My answer was C but you are correct.

Your paraphrase of the sentence makes sense. Thanks for your help :)
money9111 wrote:IMO D... gmatwriter what was your answer?

I had it down to C and D... I chose D because presupposed means assumed... so in the example given above... it's assumed that after the formula has been microwaved, that parents cannot shake it every time...

it doesn't mention anything of Different microwaves or models... C basically reaffirms the last sentence "Because microwave heat fluids unevenly, and a hot pocket in the formula could seriously injure the baby. "

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2109
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:25 pm
Location: New Jersey
Thanked: 109 times
Followed by:79 members
GMAT Score:640

by money9111 » Sat Feb 13, 2010 11:00 pm
gmatwriter you're welcome! and than you for the kind words. i'm trying to offer as much explanation in my answers 1.) for myself so if I get it wrong others can pick apart my argument and 2.) so that others can pick up from how i thought about things! glad I could help out! Let's beat the GMAT!
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants


User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 am
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times
Followed by:47 members

by komal » Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:54 pm
gmatwriter wrote:Please Explain:

There are few things worse for a new parent than listening to a baby scream in hunger while a bottle of formula slowly warms up in a bowl of hot water. So why not just pop the bottle in the microwave and zap it in 20 seconds? Because microwave heat fluids unevenly, and a hot pocket in the formula could seriously injure the baby.

Which of the following is presupposed in the argument against heating formula in the microwave?

Lets Personalize this : I heat a bowl of Formula for my baby in microwave. The microwave heats Formula unevenly. What do i do?... STIR IT & THEN FEED IT !! ....... simple !! ...... lets see which answer choice is closest to this.

a. Babies generally refuse to eat formula that has been heated in a microwave.
Incorrect : This cannot be assumed from the passage above.

b. Microwave radiation might break down some of the proteins in formula that are vital to a baby's health.
Incorrect : Microwave Radiation..... Out of scope.

c. Different microwaves use different amounts of power and consequently some models could heat a bottle to scalding temperature faster than others.
Incorrect : Microwave Models is irrelevant here.

d. Parents cannot be expected to consistently even out the temperature of a microwaved bottle by shaking it vigorously before giving it to the baby.
Correct : This is exactly what we are looking for. It is assumed in the above passage that parents cannot be expected to even out tempt. by shaking it / stirring it before giving it to the baby.

e. Once formula has been heated, any leftover formula should be discarded, because otherwise the formula could spoil between feedings and make the baby sick.
Incorrect : Between feedings is irrelevant here.

d