A year ago, dietz foods launched a yearlong advertising campaign for canned tune.last year dietz sold 12 million cans of tuna compared to the 10 million sold during the previous year,an increase directly attributable to the new customers brought in by the advertising campaign. Profits from the additional sales, were however substantially less than the cost of the advertising campaign. Clearly , therefore the campaign did nothing to further dietz economic interests
Which of the following if true, most seriously weakens the argument!
A) A less expensive advertising campaign would have brought in significantly fewer new customers for dietz canned tuna than did the campaign it launched lsat year
B) in each of the past 5 years , there was a steep , industry wide decline in sales of canned tuna
OA: B
My doubt is why not the other one ?
Which of the following if true, most seriously weakens the argument!
A) A less expensive advertising campaign would have brought in significantly fewer new customers for dietz canned tuna than did the campaign it launched lsat year
B) in each of the past 5 years , there was a steep , industry wide decline in sales of canned tuna
OA: B
My doubt is why not the other one ?
Last edited by sohrabkalra on Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
