BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A Deck of Cards

Expert replies
by csandeepreddy » Sun Oct 19, 2008 3:12 pm
Bill has a small deck of 12 playing cards made up of only 2 suits of 6 cards each. Each of the 6 cards within a suit has a different value from 1 to 6; thus, there are 2 cards in the deck that have the same value.

Bill likes to play a game in which he shuffles the deck, turns over 4 cards, and looks for pairs of cards that have the same value. What is the chance that Bill finds at least one pair of cards that have the same value?

A. 8/33
B. 62/165
C. 17/33
D. 103/165
E. 25/33

Can someone really solve this problem under two minutes?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Ian Stewart » Sun Oct 19, 2008 6:47 pm
Yes, it is possible to solve quite quickly in fact, as long as you flip the problem around: if you figure out the probability you do *not* get a pair, then subtract from 1, you find the probability of getting at least one pair. See Sudhir's solution here (and I offered an alternative direct solution in the following discussion):

www.beatthegmat.com/combination-and-per ... t8924.html
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by cramya » Sun Oct 19, 2008 8:18 pm
Ian,
Saw sudhir's solution.
In some problems I gte stumped on when to multiply veruss when to add.

For example in Sudhir's solution

thus the total probability of not picking any matching card is

10/11*8/10*6*9 =16/33


I can understand this is an AND situatiion so multiply. Is that the rule of thumb? Please advice.
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Mon Oct 20, 2008 5:47 am
Ian Stewart wrote:Yes, it is possible to solve quite quickly in fact, as long as you flip the problem around: if you figure out the probability you do *not* get a pair, then subtract from 1, you find the probability of getting at least one pair. See Sudhir's solution here (and I offered an alternative direct solution in the following discussion):

www.beatthegmat.com/combination-and-per ... t8924.html
Ian,
On a totally tangential note, can one expect to see Q which uses deck of cards as an example ?? . I am kinda curious. I agree that cards provide lot of interesting problems in probability, permutation, combn. However, I think, for a card question, the test maker has to assume that the test taker knows about them for him to refrain from mentioning them, lest the problem description would become very wordy. ( eg 4 suites of 13 cards each, blah blah). On the other hand, explaining dice in 1 sentence is easy.

Ian, stuart, stacey, ron.. your thoughts please.

thanks
-V
Join the discussion

by sudhir3127 » Mon Oct 20, 2008 6:55 am
cramya wrote:Ian,
Saw sudhir's solution.
In some problems I gte stumped on when to multiply veruss when to add.

For example in Sudhir's solution

thus the total probability of not picking any matching card is

10/11*8/10*6*9 =16/33


I can understand this is an AND situatiion so multiply. Is that the rule of thumb? Please advice.
ramya .. u can use the following link ..

https://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/56503.html
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Mon Oct 20, 2008 7:24 am
vittalgmat wrote:
Ian Stewart wrote:Yes, it is possible to solve quite quickly in fact, as long as you flip the problem around: if you figure out the probability you do *not* get a pair, then subtract from 1, you find the probability of getting at least one pair. See Sudhir's solution here (and I offered an alternative direct solution in the following discussion):

www.beatthegmat.com/combination-and-per ... t8924.html
Ian,
On a totally tangential note, can one expect to see Q which uses deck of cards as an example ?? . I am kinda curious. I agree that cards provide lot of interesting problems in probability, permutation, combn. However, I think, for a card question, the test maker has to assume that the test taker knows about them for him to refrain from mentioning them, lest the problem description would become very wordy. ( eg 4 suites of 13 cards each, blah blah). On the other hand, explaining dice in 1 sentence is easy.

Ian, stuart, stacey, ron.. your thoughts please.

thanks
-V
If you did see a question about a standard deck of cards on the GMAT, they would need to explain what's in a deck of a cards- 4 suits, thirteen types of card, etc. Otherwise people who don't play cards would be at a disadvantage. I'm pretty sure I've seen a cards question, but it had nothing to do with playing cards- the cards were numbered from 1 to 10 or something similar.

If you take an undergrad combinatorics (counting/probability) course, you'll see dozens of questions about cards; one of the standard exercises is working out the probability of various poker hands. Working out, say, the probability of being dealt a full house with five cards is too difficult for the GMAT, but could be good practice for the highest level counting problems on the test - at least, if you can do that problem, you can probably to most GMAT counting problems.

cramya- yes, if you want to determine the probability that two independent events both occur, you multiply their individual probabilities. If you still have questions after reading the link above, post here and I'll do my best to answer.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by cramya » Mon Oct 20, 2008 9:35 am
Thanks Sudhir and Ian! I appreciate the help!
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:26 pm
Thanks Ian and ramya
Join the discussion