BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG 120

Expert replies
by TkNeo » Wed Feb 13, 2008 8:26 pm
It has been estimated that the annual cost to the United States of illiteracy in lost industrial output and tax revenues is at least $20 billion a year.

A. the annual cost of illiteracy to the United States is at least $20 billion a year because of lost industrial output and tax revenues
B. illiteracy costs the United States at least $20 billion a year in lost industrial output and tax revenues.

OA:B

I agree that B sounds better than A.
Also A says "cost of illiteracy" which is sort of ambiguous.. But the OG says that A is wrong because "because of" is the incorrect idiom..

Can anyone explain the OG reasoning ?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by stellategang » Fri Feb 15, 2008 4:33 pm
see https://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:Cp ... cd=1&gl=us

"because of" modifies verbs, since it is modifing a noun here, it is incorrect

"due to" modifies nouns
Join the discussion

Re: OG 120

by joshi.komal » Sat Feb 16, 2008 1:01 pm
TkNeo wrote:It has been estimated that the annual cost to the United States of illiteracy in lost industrial output and tax revenues is at least $20 billion a year.

A. the annual cost of illiteracy to the United States is at least $20 billion a year because of lost industrial output and tax revenues
B. illiteracy costs the United States at least $20 billion a year in lost industrial output and tax revenues.

OA:B

I agree that B sounds better than A.
Also A says "cost of illiteracy" which is sort of ambiguous.. But the OG says that A is wrong because "because of" is the incorrect idiom..

Can anyone explain the OG reasoning ?
Hi ,

Answer choice A can be eliminated on basis of 2 issues.
1) redundancy. 'annual' and 'cost a year' are redundant( annual means per year)
2) The usage of modifier is not correct . This proper usage is well explained in the above url. The 'because of' should modify a verb. In this case 'cost' is used as noun so 'because of' cannot be used to modify it. If however, the sentence would have have been 'illiteracy is costing US 20 billion$ a year because of... ' then I guess the answer choice would have been correct.

Hope it helps.

Thanks
Komal
Join the discussion

by rtfact » Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:41 am
"If however, the sentence would have have been 'illiteracy is costing US 20 billion$ a year because of... ' then I guess the answer choice would have been correct."

I am not so sure. In that case "costing" would have been a gerund, thus we would still need to avoid using "because of".
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1