Columnist: Metro City has a lower percentage of residents

This topic has expert replies
Moderator
Posts: 7187
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
Followed by:23 members
Columnist: Metro City has a lower percentage of residents with humanities degrees than any other city of comparable size in our nation. Nationwide, university graduates generally earn more than people who are not university graduates, but those with humanities degrees typically earn less than do graduates with degrees in other disciplines. So the main reason Metro City has higher income per capita than any other city of comparable size in our nation must be its low percentage of residents with humanities degrees.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the columnist's argument?

A. Metro City residents with humanities degrees have higher income per capita than do people with humanities degrees in any other city of comparable size in the nation.

B. The percentage of residents with university degrees is lower in Metro City than in any other city of comparable size in the nation.

C. Nationwide, university graduates without humanities degrees typically earn more than do individuals without university degrees.

D. Metro City residents with degrees outside the humanities have per capita income no higher than the per capita income of such residents of other cities of comparable size in the nation.

E. In Metro City, a lower proportion of university graduates have humanities degrees than in any other city of comparable size in the nation.

OA D

Source: Official Guide

Legendary Member
Posts: 2214
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pm
Followed by:5 members

by deloitte247 » Fri Dec 20, 2019 10:51 pm
Premise: Metro city has a lower percentage of residents with humanities degrees than any other city of comparative size in the nation.
Conclusion: The main reason Metro city has a higher income per capita than any other city of comparative size in the nation must be its low percentage of residents with humanities degrees.

Option A - Incorrect
This option doesn't support the columnist's argument because we only know about the low percentage of humanities degrees Metro city has while Metro city has higher income per capita and not the residents with humanities degrees.

Option B - Incorrect
The passage only talked about university graduates nationwide and their rate of earning. Hence, we can't know about the percentage of residents with university degrees in Metro city.

Option C - Incorrect
It was stated that university graduates with humanities degrees in "other disciplines", hence, there is no information about university graduates without humanities degrees.

Option D - Correct
This option strengthens the colunmist's argument. Metro city has a higher income per capita than any other city of comparative size in the nation as a result of its low degrees. Therefore, this option is correct.

Option E - Incorrect
The argument is not concerned about the proportion of university graduates with humanities degrees; it is concerned about their earnings.