the restaurant company

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 120
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 1:07 pm
Location: Boston .US
Thanked: 1 times

the restaurant company

by priyankamishra11 » Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:39 am
Although the restaurant company has recently added many new restaurants across the country and its sales have increased dramatically, its sales at restaurants open for more than a year have declined.

A. the restaurant company has recently added many new restaurants across the country and its sales have increased dramatically, its
B. the restaurant company has recently added many new restaurants across the country and its sales increased dramatically, its
C. many new restaurants have recently been opened across the country and its sales increased dramatically, the restaurant company’s
D. having recently added many new restaurants across the country and with its sales increasing dramatically, the restaurant company’s
E. recently adding many new restaurants across the country and having its sales increase dramatically, the restaurant company’s
Regards,
Priyanka
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 267
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 12:20 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by Mani_mba » Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:43 am
IMO A.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 871
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:48 am
Thanked: 48 times

by stop@800 » Sun Sep 28, 2008 10:48 am
A very good Question!!

I will go with C

in A and B
we need some conector before ",its" at end
like but or something
without it, the options are not looking good to me.....

B has removed one have
so it became past tense
that also is not looking justified here


D
with its sales increasing is not fitting well....

E
having its sales increase, company's sales have decreased ..........
incorrect

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 165
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 11:25 pm
Thanked: 9 times
GMAT Score:730

by sumithshah » Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:01 am
C is wrong.

many new restaurants have recently been opened across the country and its sales increased dramatically, the restaurant company’s

It here refers to the restaurant company's sales. Which is clearly wrong. It cant even refer to the new restaurants because new restaurants is plural ( apart from the face that it alters the meaning).

The better of all evils : A

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 344
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:00 am
Location: USA
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:1 members

by Bidisha800 » Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:34 am
It is definitely A.

Although the restaurant company has recently added many new restaurants across the country and its sales have increased dramatically ===>this is the subordinate cause that can not stand independently

Independent clause ==>
its sales at restaurants open for more than a year have declined.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 871
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:48 am
Thanked: 48 times

by stop@800 » Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:16 pm
sumithshah wrote:C is wrong.

many new restaurants have recently been opened across the country and its sales increased dramatically, the restaurant company’s

It here refers to the restaurant company's sales. Which is clearly wrong. It cant even refer to the new restaurants because new restaurants is plural ( apart from the face that it alters the meaning).
I accept.
My mistake, I only read till underlined part.


CDE are out because of modifier reference problem.
out of A and B
A is certainly better.

The better of all evils : A

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:51 am
Location: India
Thanked: 3 times

by eshahid » Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:09 pm
Should be 'A'.

C, D, E are awkward constructions.
C being passive, D being awkward with 'Although having...'

E has a modifier problem 'Although recently adding many new restaurants across the country and having its sales increase dramatically' seems to modify company's sales, which is wrong as the action should be performed by company and not company's sales.

Confused between A and B. However would go with A as it seems more parallel and follows present perfect construction all throughout.

It would really help if someone can provide more convincing explanation of A being right over B. Thanks in advance.
Shahid E

=========================================
"DESTINY is not a matter of chance, Its a matter of CHOICE"

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 401
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 9:21 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by NSNguyen » Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:12 am
A. the restaurant company has recently added many new restaurants across the country and its sales have increased dramatically, its
A -> right pronoun, paralellism ( has .. have ... have)
B. the restaurant company has recently added many new restaurants across the country and its sales increased dramatically, its
C. many new restaurants have recently been opened across the country and its sales increased dramatically, the restaurant company’s
D. having recently added many new restaurants across the country and with its sales increasing dramatically, the restaurant company’s
E. recently adding many new restaurants across the country and having its sales increase dramatically, the restaurant company’s

D, E - wordy
imo: A
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 9:19 am
Location: Pune, India
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:620

by Darshan.D » Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:40 am
Yup.. A sounds the best

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 120
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 1:07 pm
Location: Boston .US
Thanked: 1 times

by priyankamishra11 » Tue Sep 30, 2008 1:26 pm
Yes guys OA is A

But my question is that "its" after comma is a possesive pronoun that is reffering to "the restaurant company" which is a Simple noun.

Although the restaurant company has recently added many new restaurants across the country and its sales have increased dramatically, its sales at restaurants open for more than a year have declined.


But a possesive pronoun can only refer to a possesive noun ..
So, according to this Logic OA is wrong.

Is there something I am missing. Can any one explain.?
Regards,
Priyanka

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 543
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:01 am
Thanked: 43 times
GMAT Score:580

by codesnooker » Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:12 pm
priyankamishra11 wrote:Yes guys OA is A

But a possesive pronoun can only refer to a possesive noun ..
So, according to this Logic OA is wrong.

Is there something I am missing. Can any one explain.?
I think you said the above statement after taking or reading notes from MH-SC book from Ch-4 (Pronouns). Am I correct?

However, in any case, there is only one mistake in the above statement. That is modifier ONLY. Please again check the MH-SC book, possessive pronoun can refer back to possessive noun. But this doesn't mean that they can not refer back to normal nouns.

I guess CR logic works over here. :D

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 120
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 1:07 pm
Location: Boston .US
Thanked: 1 times

by priyankamishra11 » Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:56 am
Yes I got my mistake. its can refer back to a normal noun.
My bad. Thanks for explaning.
Regards,
Priyanka

• Page 1 of 1