BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

The emotional impact of separation on unmarried “committed

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Mon Dec 17, 2018 10:52 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

The emotional impact of separation on unmarried "committed" couples is just as great as the emotional impact of divorce on married couples; in both situations, the loss of a trusted companion deals an emotional blow of great magnitude. Yet statistics show that a person who has separated from his or her partner in even a long-term non-marital relationship is very likely to enter into another such relationship.

Which one of the following statements represents the most logical inference that can be drawn from the statements above?

A) People do not base decisions about relationships solely on the threat of their negative emotional impact.
B) People are not likely to enter into serious relationships if they have failed at them in the past.
C) People are more affected by a divorce from a spouse than they are by the loss of a friend.
D) People often expect that a breakup from a non-spousal partner will merely be temporary.
E) People treat their romantic involvements and their friendships quite differently.

OA A

Source: Princeton Review
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

edited

by deloitte247 » Sat Jun 15, 2019 1:21 pm
Option A:- correct
This statement is logically intact with the premise in the question. Conclusively, the question shows the statistics of the possibility of separated people entering into another such relationship. Hence the statement gives a complete justification of the question.

Option B:- Incorrect
The statement here is untrue when compared with the conclusion of the likely possibility of separated people entering into another such relationship.

Option C:- Incorrect
This statement is not convincing enough to justify the question as we can infer; both measures are equal: this means that the emotional stress experienced is the same in the case of loss of a friend and divorced spouse.

Option D:- Incorrect
This option is not true according to the conclusion made from the question.

Option E:- Incorrect
This option may be true for any ordinary situation, but the emotional impact of losing a romantic partner is ranked equally with loss of friendship as specified in the question above-
Join the discussion