BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Can a certain rectangular sheet of glass be positioned on

Expert replies
by jjjinapinch » Thu Aug 03, 2017 12:16 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty—

Can a certain rectangular sheet of glass be positioned on a rectangular tabletop so that it covers the entire tabletop and its edges are parallel to the edges of the tabletop?

(1) The tabletop is 36 inches wide by 60 inches long.
(2) The area of one side of the sheet of glass is 2,400 square inches.

Official Guide question
Answer: E
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Thu Aug 03, 2017 8:58 pm
jjjinapinch wrote:Can a certain rectangular sheet of glass be positioned on a rectangular tabletop so that it covers the entire tabletop and its edges are parallel to the edges of the tabletop?

(1) The tabletop is 36 inches wide by 60 inches long.
(2) The area of one side of the sheet of glass is 2,400 square inches.

Official Guide question
Answer: E
The rectangular sheet of glass can cover the rectangular tabletop so that it covers the entire tabletop and its edges are parallel to the edges of the tabletop if

1. The longer side of the rectangular sheet of glass ≥ The longer side of the rectangular tabletop
2. The shorter side of the rectangular sheet of glass ≥ The shorter side of the rectangular tabletop

Statement 1: The tabletop is 36 inches wide by 60 inches long.

We do not have the dimensions of the rectangular sheet of glass. Insufficient!

Statement 2: The area of one side of the sheet of glass is 2,400 square inches.

Neither do we have the dimensions of the rectangular sheet of glass nor do we have the dimensions of the rectangular tabletop. Insufficient!

Statement 1 & 2:

From (1), we have the dimensions of the rectangular tabletop, but from (2), we do not have the dimensions of the rectangular sheet of glass.

Merely by knowing the area of the sheet of glass is insufficient.

Let's take two extreme cases.

Case 1: Given the area of the sheet of glass = 2400 sq inches, say the shorter side of the sheet = 1 inch, thus the longer side = 2400/1 = 2400 inches

The tabletop cannot be covered! The answer is NO.

Case 2: Given the area of the sheet of glass = 2400 sq inches, say the shorter side of the sheet = 40 inches, thus the longer side = 2400/40 = 60 inches

1. The longer side of the rectangular sheet of glass (60) = The longer side of the rectangular tabletop (60)
2. The shorter side of the rectangular sheet of glass (40) > The shorter side of the rectangular tabletop (36).

The tabletop can be covered! The answer is Yes.

No unique answer. Insufficient.

The correct answer: E

Hope this helps!

Download free ebook: Manhattan Review GMAT Quantitative Question Bank Guide

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep

Locations: New York | Singapore | London | Dubai | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Sat Aug 26, 2017 10:46 am
Hi jjjinapinch,

We're asked if a certain rectangular sheet of glass can be positioned on a rectangular tabletop so that it covers the entire tabletop and its edges are parallel to the edges of the tabletop. This is a YES/NO question. To answer it, we'll need specific information about the size of the sheet and the size of the tabletop.

1) The tabletop is 36 inches wide by 60 inches long.

Fact 1 gives us the dimensions of the tabletop, but we don't know anything about the dimensions of the sheet.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

2) The area of one side of the sheet of glass is 2,400 square inches.

Fact 2 gives us the AREA of the sheet, but NOT its specific dimensions - and we don't know the dimensions of the table. The dimensions of the sheet could be a variety of different combinations, including....
40 inches by 60 inches
30 inches by 80 inches
1 inch by 2400 inches
Etc.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, we know:
The tabletop is 36 inches by 60 inches.
The AREA of the sheet is 2400 square inches.
IF.... the dimensions of the sheet are:
40 inches by 60 inches... then the answer to the question would be YES.
30 inches by 80 inches... then the answer to the question would be NO.
Combined, INSUFFICIENT.

Final Answer: E

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by Scott@TargetTestPrep » Fri Aug 03, 2018 2:17 pm
jjjinapinch wrote:Can a certain rectangular sheet of glass be positioned on a rectangular tabletop so that it covers the entire tabletop and its edges are parallel to the edges of the tabletop?

(1) The tabletop is 36 inches wide by 60 inches long.
(2) The area of one side of the sheet of glass is 2,400 square inches.
We need to determine whether a rectangular sheet of glass can cover an entire rectangular tabletop. We are given that the edges must be parallel to the table top; however, we know neither the dimensions of the sheet of glass nor the dimensions of the tabletop.

Statement One Alone:

The tabletop is 36 inches wide by 60 inches long.

Since we do not have any information about the dimensions of the rectangular sheet of glass, statement one alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

Statement Two Alone:

The area of one side of the sheet of glass is 2,400 square inches.

Since we do not have any information about the dimensions of the tabletop, statement two alone is not sufficient to answer the question.

Statements One and Two Together:

Using the information from statements one and two we know the following:

1) The tabletop is 36 inches wide by 60 inches long.
2) The area of one side of the sheet of glass is 2,400 square inches.

While initially we may think we have enough information to solve the problem, we actually do not, because we do not know the exact dimensions of the sheet of glass.

With an area of 2,400 square inches, we can have different lengths and widths of the sheet of glass. Some of these lengths and widths will allow the sheet to cover the table, while others will not. Let's consider two cases.

Case # 1
Width of glass = 24 inches
Length of glass = 100 inches
Width of table = 36 inches
Length of table = 60 inches
We see that the width of the glass is shorter than the width of the table, so in case #1, the sheet of glass does not cover the entire table top.

Case # 2
Width of glass = 40 inches
Length of glass = 60 inches
Width of table = 36 inches
Length of table = 60 inches

We see that the width of the glass is longer than the width of the table and the length of the glass is equal to the length of the table, so in case #2, the sheet of glass does cover the entire table top.

Answer: E

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews

ImageImage
Join the discussion