-
RBBmba@2014
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:21 am
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:5 members
The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(A) The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(B) To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(C) The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(D) Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder's nephew accounted for the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius
OA : E
@ Experts, Although I got this one correct, a quick question - had the current OA E been a wrong choice, then would A have been correct in that particular case ?
Actually, it seems that the reason given in the OG for A to be wrong, is bit non-sensical because there is no way "eruption can take place in two letters" irrespective of the position of the phrase "two letters...", so evidently 'in two letters' can never modify 'eruption of Vesuvius' in any way. Thus, it means even though positioned at the end, 'in two letters' will ALWAYS modify the VERB wrote ONLY.
Would be curious to know your feedback. Much thanks in advance!
P.S: PLEASE NOTE that among the given choices, I don't have any issues in understanding why OA is preferred to A. So, kindly shed light on the above aspect only.
(A) The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(B) To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(C) The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(D) Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder's nephew accounted for the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius
OA : E
@ Experts, Although I got this one correct, a quick question - had the current OA E been a wrong choice, then would A have been correct in that particular case ?
Actually, it seems that the reason given in the OG for A to be wrong, is bit non-sensical because there is no way "eruption can take place in two letters" irrespective of the position of the phrase "two letters...", so evidently 'in two letters' can never modify 'eruption of Vesuvius' in any way. Thus, it means even though positioned at the end, 'in two letters' will ALWAYS modify the VERB wrote ONLY.
Would be curious to know your feedback. Much thanks in advance!
P.S: PLEASE NOTE that among the given choices, I don't have any issues in understanding why OA is preferred to A. So, kindly shed light on the above aspect only.












