The department defines a private passenger vehicle as one

[BTGmoderatorDC]

The department defines a private passenger vehicle as one registered to an individual with a gross weight of less than 8,000 pounds.

(A) as one registered to an individual with a gross weight of less than 8,000 pounds
(B) to be one that is registered to an individual with a gross weight of less than 8,000 pounds
(C) as one that is registered to an individual and that has a gross weight of less than 8,000 pounds
(D) to have a gross weight less than 8,000 pounds and being registered to an individual
(E) as having a gross weight of less than 8,000 pounds and registered to an individual

[deloitte247]

Option A: Wrong
Here, no clear definition as to the subject matter. The statement does not make much sense if we take a critical look at the aim of the writer who seeks a better explained definition.

Option B: Wrong
Here, the passenger vehicle is clearly defined to include all that's written in the main statement showing the possessive actions and informing distinctly that the passenger is/must be the one with gross weight. It is appropriately instructive and emphatic to state in clear terms what the writer meant. Unfortunately it is not best of options.

Option C: Wrong
This statement seeks to separate the term variables i.e. the head word and subject in the sentence. It seeks to infer that the private passenger vehicle which is the head-word is registered to an individual who's the subject and the passenger vehicle, the object has a gross weight of 80,000 pounds. This is a wrong interpretation of what the writer has said.

Option D: Wrong
Here, the individual is/should be the one with the gross weight and not the vehicle if we critically check the context of the writer's work. This is a misjudged perspective.

Option E: Right
This statement is twisted in logic not to confuse the reader or the audience but to add sensationalism to the headline word which captures the two events appropriately and correctly.