BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS answer choice mistakes

Expert replies
by pagani88 » Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:13 am
Hello community,

I have encountered in a serious trap multiple times. When doing OG2017 DS section (almost finished btw), I have made quite many mistakes when trying to choose between answer choices C and E. I succeed to identify that A and B are insufficient separately, but then I choose wrong answers, I don't know why.
Most of the time I chose E, but it turned out to be C. Choosing C, seldom turns out to be E, however. But it is almost equal throughput. 9 E to C and 6 C to E mistakes.

Our dear experts, does anyone have any advice how to tackle such a hurdle?

Thank you for your help in advance,
Artur
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ceilidh.erickson » Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:50 pm
Without seeing your work, it's impossible to say for sure what your mistake is, but it's likely that you don't yet have a solid DS process.

Here is a very comprehensive list of resources for DS strategy and common DS mistakes: https://www.beatthegmat.com/data-suffici ... tml#797668
Start by reading this.

And here are some common mistakes based on the answers you described:

"Answer was C but I chose E"
It's likely that your notation is faulty. You correctly see that stmts 1 & 2 are insufficient on their own, but you don't write down what you *do* learn from them. When you combine the stmts, you're missing key pieces of what they give you. Here's a very simplistic example:

Q: what is the value of x?

(1) x^2 = 16
"Not sufficient because squares have multiple values"

(2) x < 0
"Not sufficient because infinite values"

(1) & (2)
"Both stmts give multiple values, so must not be enough. E."

Here, if the student had written:
(1) x = 4 or -4
(2) x neg

... it would be much easier to see that combining them narrowed it to one possible value. Try writing more down!

"Answer was E but I chose C"
This usually happens when students make assumptions: "they didn't work separately, but I bet they work together." Never assume sufficiency - always test values to try to prove *insufficiency*.

Here's a common example from OG 2016, DS #113:
Is rst = 1?
(1) rs = 1
(2) st = 1
(1) "Not sufficient because we don't know about t."

(2) "Not sufficient because we don't know about r."

(1) & (2)
"We have info about all 3, looks like they're all 1. Sufficient."

Wrong! Try testing r = -1, s = -1, t = -1. Or r = 1/2, s = 2, t = 1/2. The product of all 3 might not be 1, so it's insufficient.

Hope this helps!
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion