BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If x>3,000, then x/(2x+1) is closest to...

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
by GMATCHPOINT » Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:45 pm
I know it supposed to be an easy one, but i dont understand how OG11 explains it.

from pg 97 ex. 39
answer: For all large values of x, the value of x/(2x+1) is going to be very close to the value of x/2x, which is equal to 1/2.

could you help?
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by shamz » Sun Oct 19, 2008 8:53 am
x is greater than 3000...assume its 3001
therefore 2x= 6002
1 is negilible compared to 6002
or anything greater than 6000
hence they they have assumed x/2x i.e 1/2
Join the discussion

by GMATCHPOINT » Sun Oct 19, 2008 4:37 pm
thanks a lot shamz!
Join the discussion

by Scott@TargetTestPrep » Fri Nov 17, 2017 1:42 pm
GMATCHPOINT wrote:
If x > 3000, then the value of (x)/(2x+1) is closest to?

A. 1/6
B. 1/3
C. 10/21
D. 1/2
E. 3/2
Let's say x = 3001; we have:

3001/(6002 + 1), which is about 3,000/6,000 = 1/2.

Answer: D

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews

ImageImage
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Mon Dec 04, 2017 6:03 pm
It is the night of the zombie threads tonight!

Just pick a number. Say x = 5000. Then x/(2x + 1) = 5000/10001, which is really close to 5000/10000, or 1/2.
Join the discussion

by thucanh711 » Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:58 am
Hi there, I think it is a little bit too late to answer your post, but just do it anyway, shall we?

The problem is related to the limit of a function, just in case you want to have a deeper understand.

When the variable x is as great as 3000, adding 1 or not to 2x does not affect its value. In another word, plus one is a subtle change to the variable 2x. Therefore, you can treat 2x + 1 as 2x alone.

As a result: x/2x is merely the same as x/2x+1

This is true only if variable x has a great value, or has an infinite limit.

If x is just about 5, for example, adding 1 to 2x might cause a proper change.

x/2x = 0.5
x/2x+1 = 0.45

Hope that was helpful for you.
Join the discussion