BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

CompliCATed

Expert replies
by hakyology » Mon Jul 07, 2008 7:11 am
The rear wheels of a car crossed a certain line 0.5 second after the front wheels crossed the same line. If the centers of the front and rear wheels are 20 feet apart and the car traveled in a straight line at a constant speed, which of the following gives the speed of the car in miles per hour? (5,280 feet = 1 mile)

A) (20/5,280)(60^2/0.5)
B)(20/5,280)(60/0.5)
C)(20/5,280)(0.5/60^2)
D)(20*5,280)/(60^2)(0.5)
E)(20)*(5,280)/(60)(0.5)


The answer is A.


Please explain.

Thank u.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

method I used

by dsk » Mon Jul 07, 2008 1:59 pm
for the rear wheels to pass the object after the front wheels have passed them, the distance rear wheel has to cover = distance from the rim of the front wheel to the end rim of the rear wheel. So in effect it is the distance between the centres of the tow wheels. this is 20 ft or (20/5280) miles.
Time taken to cover pass the object = 0.5 secs or (0.5/3600) hours or (0.5/60^2) hours.

So the speed would be (20/5280)/(0.5/60^2) = (20/5280)(60^2/0.5) which is option A.
Join the discussion

Re: CompliCATed

by parallel_chase » Mon Jul 07, 2008 2:34 pm
hakyology wrote:The rear wheels of a car crossed a certain line 0.5 second after the front wheels crossed the same line. If the centers of the front and rear wheels are 20 feet apart and the car traveled in a straight line at a constant speed, which of the following gives the speed of the car in miles per hour? (5,280 feet = 1 mile)

A) (20/5,280)(60^2/0.5)
B)(20/5,280)(60/0.5)
C)(20/5,280)(0.5/60^2)
D)(20*5,280)/(60^2)(0.5)
E)(20)*(5,280)/(60)(0.5)


The answer is A.


Please explain.

Thank u.
You can easily pick the answer from the choices.

We are converting ft to mile therefore we have to divide. You can eliminate D and E.
You can also eliminate B because it is converting only in minutes not in hours.

Answer C is trap answer.

We know Speed= Distance/Time

(20/5280) / (0.5/60^2) => (20/5280) (60^2/0.5)

Hence A is the correct answer.
Join the discussion

Re: method I used

by Carol » Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:41 pm
I can't figure how they came up with the (60^2/0.5)


dsk you said:

"So the speed would be (20/5280)/(0.5/60^2) = (20/5280)(60^2/0.5) which is option A." which is the same as answer C = answer A


could someone explain, why it is (60^2/0.5) and not (0.5/60^2)? :?

thank you!
Join the discussion

Re: method I used

by parallel_chase » Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:31 pm
Carol wrote:I can't figure how they came up with the (60^2/0.5)


dsk you said:

"So the speed would be (20/5280)/(0.5/60^2) = (20/5280)(60^2/0.5) which is option A." which is the same as answer C = answer A


could someone explain, why it is (60^2/0.5) and not (0.5/60^2)? :?

thank you!
answer C does not have a fraction sign

(20/5280)/(0.5/60^2) = (20/5280)(60^2/0.5)

Hope this helps
Join the discussion

by Carol » Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:48 pm
that was it :oops:

thx! parallel_chase
Join the discussion

by mbaapplicant2008 » Thu Oct 30, 2008 8:31 pm
Thank you so much, parallel_chase
Join the discussion

by Jeff@TargetTestPrep » Tue Jan 02, 2018 10:50 am
hakyology wrote:The rear wheels of a car crossed a certain line 0.5 second after the front wheels crossed the same line. If the centers of the front and rear wheels are 20 feet apart and the car traveled in a straight line at a constant speed, which of the following gives the speed of the car in miles per hour? (5,280 feet = 1 mile)

A) (20/5,280)(60^2/0.5)
B)(20/5,280)(60/0.5)
C)(20/5,280)(0.5/60^2)
D)(20*5,280)/(60^2)(0.5)
E)(20)*(5,280)/(60)(0.5)
We see that the car drives 20 ft in 0.5 seconds. Since the car drives at a constant speed, its rate o is 20 ft/0.5 seconds.

Let's convert 20 ft/0.5 sec into mph:

20 ft/0.5 sec x 1 mi/5280 ft x 3600 sec/1 hr

In the above expression, we see the units "seconds" and "feet" will cancel and we are left with:

(20 x 1 x 3600)/(0.5 x 5280 x 1) mi/hr

(20 x 3600)/(0.5 x 5280) mi/hr

Answer: A

Jeffrey Miller
Head of GMAT Instruction
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews
Join the discussion