BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If x and y are integers

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by [email protected] » Tue May 30, 2017 9:54 pm
Hi barksdale,

We're told that X and Y are INTEGERS and that X > 0. We're asked if Y > 0. This is a YES/NO question. We can solve it by TESTing VALUES.

1) 7X - 2Y > 0

IF....
X = 10, Y = 1
Then the answer to the question is YES.

X = 10, Y = -1
Then the answer to the question is NO.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

2) -Y < X

The same two TESTs that I used in Fact 1 also 'fit' Fact 2...

IF....
X = 10, Y = 1
Then the answer to the question is YES.

X = 10, Y = -1
Then the answer to the question is NO.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, we already have two TESTs that fit Fact 1 and Fact 2 and product two different answers (one YES and one NO).
Combined, INSUFFICIENT.

Final Answer: E

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Tue May 30, 2017 10:21 pm
barksdale wrote:If x and y are integers and x > 0, is y > 0?

(1) 7x - 2y > 0
(2) -y < x

What is the process we use to know the answer is D?
Statement 1: 7x - 2y > 0

=> 3.5|x| > y

Say x = 1, then for y = 3, 2 or 1, the answer is YES, y > 0. However, if y = 0 or a negative integer, the answer is NO, y is not greater than 0.

Statement 2: -y < x

=> -y < |x|

If y = Any positive integer, the answer is YES, y > 0. However, if y = 0 or one among few qualified positive integers (depending on the value of x), the answer is NO, y is not greater than 0.

Statement 1 and 2:

The cases discussed in statement 1 qualify in statement 2 also, thus, even combining both the statement would not suffice.

The correct answer: E

Hope this helps!

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep

Locations: New York | Frankfurt | Hong Kong | Zurich | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Mon Jun 05, 2017 7:03 pm
barksdale wrote:If x and y are integers and x > 0, is y > 0?

(1) 7x - 2y > 0
(2) -y < x

What is the process we use to know the answer is D?
You must have made a typo, or misread the answer key for this one. As the others have demonstrated, the correct answer is actually E, not D.

Here's a slightly different interpretation of the statements:

(1) 7x - 2y > 0
Rearrange:
7x > 2y
x > (2/7)y
So x is greater than some fraction of y... that could be true if y was some positive numbers, or if y was any negative number. Insufficient to tell us whether y is positive.

(2) -y < x
Rearrange:
x > -y
This could mean that y is any positive number - since x is positive, it will always be greater than -1 * any positive. Or y could be 0, or a negative with a smaller absolute value than x. Insufficient.

(1 & 2)
We can combine the inequalities algebraically:
x > (2/7)y
+ x > -y
-------------
2x > -(5/7)y
x > -(5/14)y

Once again, this could be true for certain positive values and certain negative values of y. Insufficient.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Jun 06, 2017 2:58 pm
barksdale wrote:If x and y are integers and x > 0, is y > 0?

(1) 7x - 2y > 0
(2) -y < x
Target question: Is y > 0

Given: x and y are integers and x > 0

Statement 1: 7x - 2y > 0
Add 2y to both sides to get: 7x > 2y
Divide both sides by 2 to get: 7x/2 > y
So, y is less than 7x/2. Since we only know that x is a positive integer, this probably isn't enough information to answer the target question.
Let's TEST some values.
If x = 2, then 7x/2 = (7)(2)/2 = 7, which means y is less than 7.
Well, it could be the case that y = 1 (in which case y > 0), or it could be the case that y = -1 (in which case y < 0)
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: -y < x
Rearrange to get: y > -x
Since we only know that x is a positive integer, this probably isn't enough information to answer the target question.
Let's TEST some values.
If x = 2, then -x = -2, which means y is greater than -2.
Well, it could be the case that y = 1 (in which case y > 0), or it could be the case that y = -1 (in which case y < 0)
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
IMPORTANT: Notice that I was able to use the same counter-examples to show that each statement ALONE is not sufficient. So, the same counter-examples will satisfy the two statements COMBINED.
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: E

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion