BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Prep Question Pack 1 DS If a, b, and c are three numbe

Expert replies
by richachampion » Fri May 19, 2017 12:19 am
If a, b, and c are three numbers on the number line shown above, is c between a and b?

1) b<0
2) a-b > c
Attachments
screen_shot_2012_05_16_at_70359_pm_177.png
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by [email protected] » Fri May 19, 2017 10:53 am
Hi richachampion,

This question can be solved by TESTing VALUES. To start though, it's important to note that we don't know the 'relative scale' of this number line. A and B might be 'close together' or 'far apart.' We also don't know if the three variables (A, B and C) are integers or not. We DO know that B is GREATER than A though (since it's farther right on the number line).

We're asked if C is between A and B. This is a YES/NO question.

1) B < 0

This Fact tells us that B is NEGATIVE (so A must ALSO be negative - since it's farther to the left than B is). However, we don't know anything about C.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

2) (A - B) > C

IF....
A = -2 and B = -1, then (A-B) = -1.... and -1 > C....

IF....
C = -1.5, then the answer to the question is YES
C = -3, then the answer to the question is NO
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, the two TESTs that I used in Fact 2 fit both Facts and provide different answers to the question (one YES and one NO).
Combined, INSUFFICIENT

Final Answer: E

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by richachampion » Tue May 23, 2017 8:56 pm
I have a new learning while solving this question.

Statement 1 alone is not sufficient.

Let us discuss the statement 2 and statement 1 + statement 2.

A finding →

a-b will always lie between a and b irrespective of the sign of a and b.

Precisely, this one →

a-b = - |a-b|

a-b > c doesn't tell anything. That means statement 2 is also discarded.

The combination of statement 1 and statement 2 only tells that we are now dealing with the negative axis, but still, the statement 2 is valid and hence we can't infer whether "C" lies between a and b or away from "a" on the negative axis.
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 → 720 → 740
Target Score: 760+
[email protected]
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed May 24, 2017 4:55 am
richachampion wrote:If a, b, and c are three numbers on the number line shown above, is c between a and b?

1) b < 0
2) a - b > c
Target question: is c between a and b?

Statement 1: b < 0
No information about c, so statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: a - b > c
There are several sets of numbers that meet this condition. Here are two:
Case a: a = -3, b = -1 and c = -2.5 in which case c is between a and b
Case b: a = -3, b = -1 and c = -5 in which case c is not between a and b
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined:
There are still several sets of numbers that meet this condition. Here are two:
Case a: a = -3, b = -1 and c = -2.5 in which case c is between a and b
Case b: a = -3, b = -1 and c = -5 in which case c is not between a and b
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer = E

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion