BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Combined inequality and absolute question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ceilidh.erickson » Thu Apr 13, 2017 4:17 pm
What is the source of this question? First of all, it's a copyright violation to post content without citing the original source. Secondly, this question is incorrect as posted (not to mention unrealistically labor-intensive).

When you're given absolute values with inequalities, you have to establish different cases for POSITIVES v. NEGATIVES.

First, let's interpret the given: |x - a| < |x - b|
Test cases for x, a, and b that fit:
Image

etc. (You wouldn't really need to test all of these, nor is this exhaustive. I'm just giving several examples).

We need more information on whether x, a, and b are positive or negative, and/or information about their relative sizes before we know anything concrete.

Now interpret the question: a < ba < b?

When would the product of two numbers be greater than one number, but smaller than the other?
- Neither of the numbers could be 0 or 1, because then 2 of those values would be equal.
- They can't both be positive integers, because then ab would be greater than a or b.
- a could be a fraction between 0 and 1, and b could be greater than 1. ab then would be in between
- They cannot both be negative, since ab would then be positive
- It could be that a is negative less than -1, and b is a positive fraction btw 0 and 1

There is not one simple way to rephrase this question - there are a variety of scenarios to consider.

1. ab < 0

This tells us that one of the variables is negative, the other is positive. With the given information, several of our examples from the given information fit:
x = 10, a = 3, b = -2
--> a < ab < b ?
--> 3 < -6 < -2
--> NO.

x = 1/8, a = -1/8, b = 7/8
--> a < ab < b ?
--> -1/8 < -7/64 < 7/8
--> YES.

Insufficient.


2. For all x > 0, |x - a| = |x| + |a|

This doesn't tell us anything about b, so we can tell from a glance that it's insufficient.

But, here's how we would interpret: For all x > 0, |x - a| = |x| + |a|

Image

Since x must be positive, a must be either negative or 0.

Together:
(1) a and b have different signs (one negative, one positive)
(2) x is positive, a </= 0

See what scenarios remain from our original analysis:

Image

Two of our original scenarios work.
#1: a = -3, b = 8
--> a < ab < b ?
--> -3 < -24 < 8
--> No.

#2: a = -1/8, b = 7/8
--> a < ab < b ?
--> -1/8 < -7/64 < 7/8
--> Yes.

(1) and (2) together are INSUFFICIENT. The correct answer should be E.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Apr 14, 2017 5:32 am
Mo2men wrote:2. For all x>0, |x−a|=|x|+|a|
The intent here is unclear.
The portion in red seems to imply the following:
If x>0, then |x−a|=|x|+|a|.
If x≤0, then it does NOT have to be true that |x−a|=|x|+|a|.
Since the intended meaning is unclear, I would ignore this problem.
What is the source?
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Sun Apr 23, 2017 6:01 am
Mo2men - following up. Please post the source of this question.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion