BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Is |x−z−y| > x−z+y?.......Veritas question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Fri Apr 14, 2017 4:40 am
Mo2men wrote:Is |x−z−y| > x−z+y?

(1) 0<x<z<y
(2) (x-z-y) is negative

OA: A

Source: Veritas
Hi Mo2men,

Statement 1: 0<x<z<y

0<x<z<y implies that each of x, y, and z is positive.

|x-z-y| must be a negative number since x < (y+z).

Thus, we have: Is -(x-z-y) > x-z+y?

=> -x+z+y > x-z+y

=> 2z > 2x; y cancells

=> z > x--> This is a fact given in the statement. Sufficient.

Statement 2: (x-z-y) is negative

x-z-y < 0

=> x < (y+z)

|x-z-y| must be a negative number since x < (y+z), Thus, we have: Is |a negative number| > x-z+y?

Now we have the same situation as was in statement 1.

So, we reach at: Is x < z? We do not know this. This fact belonged to statement 1 and not to statement 2. Insufficient.

The correct answer: A

Hope this helps!

Relevant book: Manhattan Review GMAT Number Properties Guide

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep

Locations: Helsinki | Copenhagen | Bukarest | Riga | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
Last edited by Jay@ManhattanReview on Fri Apr 14, 2017 6:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Apr 14, 2017 5:04 am
Mo2men wrote:Is |x−z−y| > x−z+y?

(1) 0<x<z<y
(2) (x-z-y) is negative
Statement 1: 0<x<z<y
Since x<z, x-z < 0.
Inequalities in which the <> faces the SAME DIRECTION can be ADDED TOGETHER.
Adding together x-z < 0 and 0 < y, we get:
(x-z) + 0 < 0 + y
x-z-y < 0.

Since x-z-y < 0, |x-z-y| = -(x-z-y).
Substituting |x-z-y| = -(x-z-y) into the question stem, we get:
Is -(x-z-y) > x-z+y?

Simplifying the question stem, we get:
-(x-z-y) > x-z+y ?
-x+z+y > x-z+y ?
2z > 2x ?
z > x ?


Since Statement 1 indicates that z>x, the answer to the question stem is YES.
SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: (x-z-y) is negative

As shown in the blue portion above, x-z-y < 0 enables us to rephrase the question stem as follows:
z > x ?
x-z-y < 0 implies that z > x-y.
No way to determine whether z>x.
INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Mo2men » Fri Apr 14, 2017 5:53 am
Jay@ManhattanReview wrote:
Mo2men wrote:Is |x−z−y| > x−z+y?

(1) 0<x<z<y
(2) (x-z-y) is negative

OA: A

Source: Veritas
Hi Mo2men,

Statement 1: 0<x<z<y

0<x<z<y implies that each of x, y, and z is positive.

|x-z-y| must be a negative number since x < (y+z).

Thus, we have: Is -(x-z-y) < x-z+y?; mind the reversal of inequality sign

=> -x+z+y < x-z+y

=> 2x < 2z; y cancells

=> x < z--> This is a fact given in the statement. Sufficient.
I feel something wrong here in red.Following your final step, it gives:

-x+z+y < x-z+y

2z < 2x.
Join the discussion

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Fri Apr 14, 2017 6:11 am
Mo2men wrote:
Jay@ManhattanReview wrote:
Mo2men wrote:Is |x−z−y| > x−z+y?

(1) 0<x<z<y
(2) (x-z-y) is negative

OA: A

Source: Veritas
Hi Mo2men,

Statement 1: 0<x<z<y

0<x<z<y implies that each of x, y, and z is positive.

|x-z-y| must be a negative number since x < (y+z).

Thus, we have: Is -(x-z-y) < x-z+y?; mind the reversal of inequality sign

=> -x+z+y < x-z+y

=> 2x < 2z; y cancells

=> x < z--> This is a fact given in the statement. Sufficient.
I feel something wrong here in red.Following your final step, it gives:

-x+z+y < x-z+y

2z < 2x.
Hi Mo2men,

Thanks for pointing it out. It's incorrect, I edit my response.

-Jay
Join the discussion