BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

If x < 3, is (x + 1)/(x - 3)

Expert replies
by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Feb 10, 2017 8:14 am
Here's one I just made up.
Estimated difficulty level: 650
If x < 3, is (x + 1)/(x - 3) > 1/3?

(1) x < 2
(2) x > -1
Answer: B

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Fri Feb 10, 2017 8:35 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:Here's one I just made up.
Estimated difficulty level: 650
If x < 3, is (x + 1)/(x - 3) > 1/3?

(1) x < 2
(2) x > -1
Answer: B

Cheers,
Brent
Brent original!

We could always do a little number-picking.

S1: Say x = 0; (x + 1)/(x - 3) = 1/-3 = -(1/3). Not greater than 1/3 so we get a NO.
x = -10; (x + 1)/(x - 3) = -9/-13 = 9/13. Greater than 1/3, so we get a YES. S1 is not sufficient.

S2: We already know that x = 0 gives us a NO. What about 1? (x + 1)/(x - 3) = 2/-2 = -1. Not greater than 1/3. Again, we get a NO. Not a coincidence.

If -1 < x < 3, the numerator will always be positive and the denominator will always be negative, so we're dealing with a negative number, which, of course, is less than 1/3. Because the answer is always NO, this statement alone is sufficient. Answer is B
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Feb 10, 2017 11:51 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:If x < 3, is (x + 1)/(x - 3) > 1/3?

(1) x < 2
(2) x > -1
Given: x < 3

Target question: Is (x + 1)/(x - 3) > 1/3?
This is a good candidate for rephrasing the target question.
Aside: Here's a video with tips on rephrasing the target question: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... cy?id=1100

Since x < 3, we know that (x - 3) will always be NEGATIVE.
So, let's take (x + 1)/(x - 3) > 1/3, and multiply both sides by (x - 3)
We get: x + 1 < (1/3)(x - 3) [ASIDE: since we multiplied both sides by a NEGATIVE value, we REVERSED the inequality sign]
Now take x + 1 < (1/3)(x - 3) and multiply both sides by 3 to get: 3(x + 1) < x - 3
Expand to get: 3x + 3 < x - 3
Subtract x from both sides: 2x + 3 < -3
Subtract 3 from both sides: 2x < -6
Divide both sides by 2 to get: x < -3

This equivalent inequality is much easier to work with. So, ....
REPHRASED target question: Is x < -3?

Statement 1: x < 2
There are several values of x that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: x = -7, in which case x < -3
Case b: x = 0, in which case x > -3
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: x > -1
If x is greater than -1, then we can be 100% certain that x IS NOT less than -3
Since we can answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer: B

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion