BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Philosopher

Expert replies
by arorag » Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:14 pm
Philosopher: An action is morally right if it would be
reasonably expected to increase the aggregate
well-being of the people affected by it. An action
is morally wrong if and only if it would be
reasonably expected to reduce the aggregate wellbeing
of the people affected by it. Thus, actions
that would be reasonably expected to leave
unchanged the aggregate well-being of the people
affected by them are also right.
The philosopher's conclusion follows logically if which
one of the following is assumed?
(A) Only wrong actions would be reasonably
expected to reduce the aggregate well-being of
the people affected by them.
(B) No action is both right and wrong.
(C) Any action that is not morally wrong is morally
right.
(D) There are actions that would be reasonably
expected to leave unchanged the aggregate
well-being of the people affected by them.
(E) Only right actions have good consequences.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by mehravikas » Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:54 pm
Is it D?
Join the discussion

by kbharadwaj.1987 » Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:29 pm
I guess it's C.
Join the discussion

by ambreenss » Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:39 pm
i guess its C?? can u plz tell us what is OA
Join the discussion

by heshamelaziry » Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:34 pm
Sure C
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:32 am
IMO A
Join the discussion

by khanshainur » Mon May 16, 2016 12:04 am
I totally agree. Answer should be C
Join the discussion