BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Teachers

Expert replies
by arorag » Mon Sep 21, 2009 5:41 pm
Of those person who became teachers in 1968 and who later left the profession, 30 percent today earn salaries above $35,000 a year: of those who became teachers in 1968 and have remained in the profession, only 15 percent today earn salaries above $35,000 a year. These figures indicate how underpaid teachers are today.
The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions about the persons for whom statistics are cited?
(A) At least one-third of the group of persons who have remained in teaching would today be earning more than $35,000 a year if they had left teaching.
(B) The group of persons who left teaching and the group who did not are comparable in terms of factors that determine how much people outside the teaching profession are paid.
(C) Most of those persons who left teaching did so entirely because of the low salaries teachers earn.
(D) As a group, those persons who have remained in teaching are abler and more dedicated than the group of persons who left teaching.
(E) The group of persons who left teaching and who today earn more than $35,000 a year were more capable teachers than the group who remained in the profession.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sunnyjohn » Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:01 pm
IMO:C

Because they left profession because of low salary...that why we can conclude now that teachers are not underpaid.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:01 pm
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:50 pm
(A) At least one-third of the group of persons who have remained in teaching would today be earning more than $35,000 a year if they had left teaching.<- It is aprediction rather than assumption..

(B) The group of persons who left teaching and the group who did not are comparable in terms of factors that determine how much people outside the teaching profession are paid.<- Correct , if two groups are not comparable then no conclusion can be made.. thus CORRECT...

(C) Most of those persons who left teaching did so entirely because of the low salaries teachers earn. <- No support for this assumption

(D) As a group, those persons who have remained in teaching are abler and more dedicated than the group of persons who left teaching.<- No support for this assumption
(E) The group of persons who left teaching and who today earn more than $35,000 a year were more capable teachers than the group who remained in the profession.<- No support in passage for this assumption
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:03 am
Should be 'B' argument assumes that both the groups are comparable in terms of salaries and draws a conclusion that teachers are underpaid.
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:26 pm
OA plz...
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Tue Sep 29, 2009 11:42 pm
the arguement about statistic number is based normally on representativeness or simple mathamatics. in this case, it is based on representativeness of evidence. B is correct.
Join the discussion

by delhiboy1979 » Tue Sep 29, 2009 11:57 pm
Go with B as well, C cannot be correct since it is nowhere mentioned that teachers left because of the low salary, there could be other reasons.
Join the discussion

B vs C

by kiennguyen » Mon Oct 05, 2009 6:14 am
B-not correct b/c group of persons who left the teaching profession is not equal/much fewer to group of persons who are outside the teaching profession.
C-correct b/c it points out one reason why a group of teachers left their profession.
Join the discussion

by umaa » Mon Oct 05, 2009 6:22 am
Why A is wrong?
What we think, we become
Join the discussion

by vaibhav.iit2002 » Mon Oct 05, 2009 6:31 am
IMO B.
I am surprised why no OA after this much discussion
Join the discussion

by arorag » Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:21 pm
Sorry for posting OA after long time

OA is B
Join the discussion

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 9:36 pm
I'm going with B. No confidence on my answer. Can anyone tell OA?
Join the discussion