BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

One State

Expert replies
by joyseychow » Wed Aug 05, 2009 6:13 am
One state adds a 7 percent sales tax to the price of most products purchased within its jurisdiction. This tax, therefore, if viewed as tax on income, has the reverse effect of the federal income tax: the lower the income, the higher the annual percentage rate at which the income is taxed.
The conclusion above would be properly drawn if which of the following were assumed as a premise?
(A) The amount of money citizens spend on products subject to the state tax tends to be equal across income levels.
(B) The federal income tax favors citizens with high incomes, whereas the state sales tax favors citizens with low incomes.
(C) Citizens with low annual incomes can afford to pay a relatively higher percentage of their incomes in state sales tax, since their federal income tax is relatively low.
(D) The lower a state’s sales tax, the more it will tend to redistribute income from the more affluent citizens to the rest of society.
(E) Citizens who fail to earn federally taxable income are also exempt from the state sales tax.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gmat_dest » Wed Aug 05, 2009 7:07 am
Conclusion:

the lower the income, the higher the annual percentage rate at which the income is taxed.

For the above to be TRUE, A has to be the necessary assumption.

Hence A is the answer.
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:52 pm
Should be A
Join the discussion

by arorag » Wed Aug 05, 2009 5:16 pm
Agree with A
Join the discussion

by jjk » Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:21 pm
Join the discussion

by Musicolo » Thu Aug 06, 2009 1:18 am
i dont get why A is the answer
Join the discussion

by joyseychow » Thu Aug 06, 2009 3:25 am
gmat_dest wrote:Conclusion:

the lower the income, the higher the annual percentage rate at which the income is taxed.

For the above to be TRUE, A has to be the necessary assumption.

Hence A is the answer.
Could you pls. explain further? I still don't get it.
Join the discussion

by real2008 » Thu Aug 06, 2009 12:15 pm
C should be the answer
Join the discussion

by belize » Thu Aug 06, 2009 1:17 pm
I think A is correct. I approach it as a math question.

Conclusion: 7% state tax rate is higher for lower income families.
Premise: Fed tax rate is proportional to income level.
Assumption: low income families and high income families spend equal amount. For instance, if they both spend $100 on a product, the tax is $7.

For low income families who earn $50, $7 is 14%. On the other hand, for high income families who earn $100, $7 is 7%.

It helps validate the conclusion that the state tax is higher for lower income families and vice versa.
Join the discussion

Re: One State

by perfectstranger » Mon Aug 17, 2009 8:13 am
joyseychow wrote: therefore, if viewed as tax on income, has the reverse effect of the federal income tax: the lower the income, the higher the annual percentage rate at which the income is taxed.

The conclusion above would be properly drawn if which of the following were assumed as a premise?

(A) The amount of money citizens spend on products subject to the state tax tends to be equal across income levels.
Bold part is the conclusion : lower income higher tax rate
Premise 1: 7% of sale tax on sales

Assume 100 $ spent for monthly grains 7 $ tax both if monthly income is 500 $ then this makes 1.4% of monthly income. Assume 1000$ is monthly income then this makes 0.07% of monthly income.

If the tax is not equal to everyone then these percentages will be changed may be they will be equal which will violate the conclusion.Thanks Belize for nice explanation.
Please do not post answers visibly . Please hide them or post them later after the discussion.
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 9:12 pm
I feel the answer will be C
Join the discussion