I went with D.
First one is a summary question is it evidence. It is the first conclsion reached by the bank depostors.
sec- is the author's conclusion. So wont it be the final say.
Thanks
khurram
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
removed as question was wrong
Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning |
This conclusion is : They might well be overoptimistic in based on the evidence that the top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness (intermediate conclusion of the argument) so the correct answer must be E.
WHY IS THE ANS not D
They might well be overoptimistic --is this not the main conclusion also.
Thanks
khurram
They might well be overoptimistic --is this not the main conclusion also.
Thanks
khurram
WHY IS THE ANS not D?
Since the second part in D is an assumption and not a conclusion as explained in E
Since the second part in D is an assumption and not a conclusion as explained in E
















