BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Visa

Expert replies
by manik11 » Fri Feb 26, 2016 9:16 am
In 1980 the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) granted 1024 refugee status visas, and R of these visas were granted to people from Eastern Europe. In 1990 the total number of such visas granted by the INS was 1468, and r of these were granted to people from Eastern Europe. If the number of refugee status visas to people from Eastern Europe increased from 1980 to 1990, was the increase greater than 20%?

(1) r = R + 33
(2) 1/6 < r/1468 < 1/5

OA : C
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by [email protected] » Fri Feb 26, 2016 9:40 am
Hi manik11,

While this DS question is 'wordy', it can be answered by TESTing VALUES and thinking logically about how the two variables relate to one another.

We're given a series of facts to start:
1) in 1980, R of 1024 visas were granted to people from E.E.
2) In 1990, r of 1468 visas were granted to people from E.E.
3) r > R

We're asked if r is greater than R by MORE than 20%. This is a YES/NO question.

1) r = R + 33

IF...
R = 1
r = 34
(34-1)/1 = 33 = 3300% greater
Then the answer to the question is YES.

IF...
R = 1000
r = 1034
(1034-1000)/1000 = 34/1000 = 0.34% greater
Then the answer to the question is NO.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT.

From this information, you should note that as R gets bigger, the percentage increase from R to r gets SMALLER.

2) 1/6 < r/1468 < 1/5

This Fact tells us NOTHING about the value of R, so we cannot determine the relationship between those two values.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT.

Combined, we know....
r = R + 33
1/6 < r/1468 < 1/5

From the second fact, we can do a quick approximation. 1/6 of 1468 is about 244 and 1/5 of 1468 is about 294, so...
244 < r < 294

IF....
r = 245
R = 212
(245-212)/212 = 33/212 = about 15% greater
Then the answer to the question is NO.

As r and R get increase, the percentage increase will DECREASE, so that increase will ALWAYS be LESS than 20% and the answer to the question is ALWAYS NO.
Combined, SUFFICIENT

Final Answer: C

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Feb 26, 2016 12:51 pm
manik11 wrote:In 1980 the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) granted 1024 refugee status visas, and R of these visas were granted to people from Eastern Europe. In 1990 the total number of such visas granted by the INS was 1468, and r of these were granted to people from Eastern Europe. If the number of refugee status visas to people from Eastern Europe increased from 1980 to 1990, was the increase greater than 20%?

(1) r = R + 33
(2) 1/6 < r/1468 < 1/5
Question stem:
Is r more than 120% of R?

Translated into math:
r > (120/100)R ?
r > (6/5)R ?

Statement 1:
Substituting R = r-33 into the resulting inequality above, we get:
r > (6/5)(r - 33) ?
5r > 6r - 198 ?
198 > r ?
r < 198 ?

No way to determine whether r < 198.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2:
No information about R.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
Rephrased question stem yielded by Statement 1:
Is r < 198 ?

Test r=198 in 1/6 < r/1468:

1/6 < 198/1468
1468*1 < 6*198
1468 < integer less than 1200.
Doesn't work:
The right-hand side is too small.

To increase the value of the right-hand side, r must increase to a value GREATER THAN 198.
Thus, the answer to the rephrased question stem is NO.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Mar 04, 2016 4:31 pm
S1::

Try some extreme values. We could have r = 34, R = 1, in which case the increase is huge. We could also have r = 1057, R = 1024, in which case the increase is very small. NOT SUFFICIENT

S2::

1468/5 > r > 1468/6

293.6 > r > 244.66...

But this doesn't tell us about R; NOT SUFFICIENT.

S1+S2::

We could have anything from r = 245, R = 212 to r = 293, R = 260. The smaller value gives us the bigger increase, so consider 20% greater than 212. This would be

212 * 1.2

or

≈254

So we can't have an increase of at least 20%, and we're set!

A lot of arithmetic in this problem!
Join the discussion