BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Random distinct numbers

Expert replies
by manik11 » Wed Oct 28, 2015 7:05 am
Experts..could you guys please show me a time efficient way to approach this question?

Two distinct numbers a and b are chosen randomly from the set of first 20 positive integers. What is the probability that |a-b| would not be divisible by 3?
49/380
21/95
49/190
42/95
133/190

OA : E
Source : Veritas Prep
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Oct 28, 2015 7:22 am
manik11 wrote:Experts..could you guys please show me a time efficient way to approach this question?

Two distinct numbers a and b are chosen randomly from the set of first 20 positive integers. What is the probability that |a-b| would not be divisible by 3?
49/380
21/95
49/190
42/95
133/190
Look for a PATTERN and BALLPARK.
Options for the value of |a-b}:
|a-b| = 1
|a-b| = 2

|a-b| = 3
|a-b| = 4
|a-b} = 5

|a-b| = 6
|a-b| = 7
|a-b} = 8

|a-b| = 9
And so on.

The options in red suggest that, of every 3 options for |a-b|, approximately 2 will NOT be divisible by 3.
Thus, the correct answer choice must be close to 2/3.
Only E is viable:
133/190 ≈ 120/180 = 2/3.

The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:00 am
Hi manik11,

The answer choices to this question provide a great 'logic shortcut' that you can take advantage of.

The calculation that we're asked to consider (|A-B|) and the limited possible values for the two distinct variables (1-20, inclusive) means that we're dealing with possible answers that are consecutive integers: 1 through 19, inclusive.

When dealing with consecutive integers, only 1 out of every "set" of 3 will be divisible by 3. This question asks for the probability that the calculation will NOT be divisible by 3. Thus, the answer MUST be greater than 1/2 (closer to about 2/3). There's ONLY one answer that's greater than one half....

Final Answer: E

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by Max@Math Revolution » Thu Oct 29, 2015 12:59 am
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In PS, IVY approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer.


Two distinct numbers a and b are chosen randomly from the set of first 20 positive integers. What is the probability that |a-b| would not be divisible by 3?
49/380
21/95
49/190
42/95
133/190




Let's divide the first 20 positive integers into 3 sets according to the remainder as dividing by 3. namely
O = {3 , 6 , 9 , ... , 18} ---> the number of elements of O = 6
I = {1 , 4 , 7 , ... , 19} ---> the number of elements of I = 7
II = {2 , 5 , 8 , ... , 20} ---> the number of elements of II = 7

If we choose a, b among the set O then the remainder of a-b would be 0.
Similarly if we choose a, b among the set I or among the set II the remainder of a-b would be 0. So we should choose a, b set O and set I(--> the number of cases 6*7) or set O and set II(--> the number of cases 6*7) or set I and set II(--> the number of cases 7*7).

The total number of choosing two different numbers among 20 numbers is 20C2= 190. So the probability is (42+42+49)/190 = 113/190.

The answer is, therefore, (E)
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Thu Oct 29, 2015 11:57 pm
Another efficient testday approach here is approximation. Since 1/3 of the integers are divisible by 3, (2/3) of them are NOT divisible by 3. We're picking randomly from a set of consecutive integers, so our answer should be somewhere in the neighborhood of 2/3, and only 133/190 (which reduces to 7/10) is close. (Everything else is less than 1/2, so none of these answers is promising.)
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Oct 30, 2015 12:02 am
A proper approach (longer, but more edifying) would look something like this:

If a and b have the same remainder when divided by 3, then |a - b| will be divisible by 3. We can see this algebraically. Suppose a = 3*something + 2 and b also = 3*(something else) + 2. Then

a - b =
(3*something + 2) - (3*something else + 2) =
3*something - 3*something else =
a multiple of 3

This will work if the remainders are both 1 as well (or both 0, obviously), so we'll always get a multiple of 3.

The question then reduces to "What is the probability that a and b have the SAME remainder when divided by 3?" From here, I'd just count the possibilities.

remainder 0: 3, 6, 9, ..., 18 (6 options)
remainder 1: 1, 4, ..., 19 (7 options)
remainder 2: 2, 5, ..., 20 (7 options)

So there are (6*5)/2 ways of choosing two numbers with remainder 0, (7*6)/2 ways of choosing two numbers with remainder 1, and (7*6)/2 ways of choosing two numbers with remainder 2.

That gives us 15 + 21 + 21 = 57 ways of choosing two numbers with the same remainder. There are (20*19)/2, or 190 ways of picking ANY pair of these numbers, so

Prob(divisible by 3) = 57/190
and
Prob(not divisible by 3) = 1 - 57/190 = 133/190
Join the discussion