BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Question Nos. 59 and 70 in Official Quant Guide

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
by snuman » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:23 am
Can anybody explain the difference of logic behind in Question Nos. 59 and 70 in the Official Quant Guide?

Q 59 asks for the value of "exactly 2 standard deviation less than mean" and calculates it as: " [mean - 2 standard devistion]", while Q 70 asks for "value more than 2.5 standard deviation from the mean" and calculates it as in the range: "[mean - 2.5 standard devistion] and [mean + 2.5 standard devistion]. Why the range in Q 70 not in Q 59?

Nauman
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

snuman wrote:Can anybody explain the difference of logic behind in Question Nos. 59 and 70 in the Official Quant Guide?

Q 59 asks for the value of "exactly 2 standard deviation less than mean" and calculates it as: " [mean - 2 standard devistion]", while Q 70 asks for "value more than 2.5 standard deviation from the mean" and calculates it as in the range: "[mean - 2.5 standard devistion] and [mean + 2.5 standard devistion]. Why the range in Q 70 not in Q 59?

Nauman
Hey,

The main thing to notice in the question is that 59 is explicitly asking for a number by saying "exactly 2" deviations less than the mean.

In 70, saying "a value more than 2.5 deviations away from the mean", is different from saying "2.5 deviations more than the mean." (Notice the difference in word order)

Think of it like a number line:
1. the first one is like asking for a numbers that are 2 units away from zero {-2,2}

2. the second one is asking for a number 2 units more than 0 or 2.

Hope that help explain the difference in what they are asking. Again, it is mostly a difference in the wording of the question. Let me know if you have any more questions.
Join the discussion

by snuman » Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:37 am
I appreciate your reply. But im still confused.

You come up with "2" for a value two units more than zero on a number line, but the question No. 70 calculates it differently and instead of a single value, it goes for range.
Join the discussion

by snuman » Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:43 am
Hi Mpalmer22,

I got it now. Actually i got confused with your point 1 and 2. But i think you have made it clear by highlighting the difference in wordings.

Thanks

Nauman
Join the discussion