- talaangoshtari
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Wed May 21, 2014 4:29 am•Followed by: 1 member
- Thanked: 8 times
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
5 tech company's stocks
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Insights |
We can see in the graph that Palfind ranged in price from about $39 to about $59. If he bought at the lowest price and sold at the highest, he made a profit of 59 - 39 = $20 on each share. If he bought and sold 800 shares, his total profit would be 20*800 = $16,000.
Sure thing. (But note: the wording of this question is a bit problematic. We're given the range of the prices of the stocks, but not the starting or ending values. Take, Friendbook, for example. We know the range of the prices was 30-60. So if we started at 30 and ended at 60, we'd have a 100% increase for the year. But if we started at 60 and ended at 30, there'd be a 50% decrease. And how do we that we didn't start at 45, drop to 30 at some point, rise to 60 at another point, and then end at 45 again? In this case, there'd be no net start-end change. So, for argument's sake, I'm going to pretend that the question is asking about the largest percent increase from the min to the max values.)
#7: First, let's summarize the price ranges for all the stocks:
Friendbook: 30 - 60
Micro Tech: 62 - 70
LinkUp 10 -20
SearchWiz: 20 - 50
PalFind: 39 - 59
The largest percent increase was SearchWiz, [(50 - 20)/20] * 100 = 150%.
We want to know what percent the min price was of the max price, so 20/50 = 40%.
#7: First, let's summarize the price ranges for all the stocks:
Friendbook: 30 - 60
Micro Tech: 62 - 70
LinkUp 10 -20
SearchWiz: 20 - 50
PalFind: 39 - 59
The largest percent increase was SearchWiz, [(50 - 20)/20] * 100 = 150%.
We want to know what percent the min price was of the max price, so 20/50 = 40%.
In number 8, we're told that Ann held 90 shares of the company that changed by the smallest amount. (I'll assume that we're talking about the smallest range from min - max.) Looking at our ranges, we can see that Micro Tech is the only stock that changes by less than $10.
Friendbook: 30 - 60
Micro Tech: 62 - 70
LinkUp 10 -20
SearchWiz: 20 - 50
PalFind: 39 - 59
If we have 90 shares of Micro Tech, and sell at the max value, we'll have 70*90 = $6300 to spend. If we used that to buy the cheapest stock at its minimum value, we'll be buying LinkUp at $10/share. 6300/10 = 630 shares of Linkup.
Friendbook: 30 - 60
Micro Tech: 62 - 70
LinkUp 10 -20
SearchWiz: 20 - 50
PalFind: 39 - 59
If we have 90 shares of Micro Tech, and sell at the max value, we'll have 70*90 = $6300 to spend. If we used that to buy the cheapest stock at its minimum value, we'll be buying LinkUp at $10/share. 6300/10 = 630 shares of Linkup.












