BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

stuck on ds question

Post your questions about customer service issues, GMAT exam policies, and GMAT exam structure. Get an official answer from GMAC, the organization behind the GMAT test!
Expert replies
Source: — Ask the Test Maker |

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:57 am
is x<y?
(1) 2x<3y
(2) xy>0
S1: 2x < 3y
Rephrase: x < (3/2)y
Or: x < 1.5y

Now pick numbers to test. x = 1.4, y = 1; x <y? NO
x = .5, y = 1; x <y? YES

So S1 is not sufficient.

S2: xy > 0; This just means that x and y have the same charge. Both are + or both are -
No reason we can't use the same scenarios we used to test S1 (both of these scenarios used two positive numbers)
x = 1.4, y = 1; x <y? NO
x = .5, y = 1; x <y? YES

So S2 is not sufficient.

Together: So now we know that x < 1.5y, and that x and y are either both + or -. Because we used the same numbers to test S1 and S2 individually, we can use them again to test the statements together, as we already know that they'll satisfy both conditions. In each case, x < 1.5y and xy>0.
Again:
x = 1.4, y = 1; x <y? NO
x = .5, y = 1; x <y? YES

So together they are not sufficient.

Answer is E.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion