BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Inequalities - please help

Expert replies
by sachin_yadav » Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:25 am
Is M + Z > 0
(1) M - 3Z > 0
(2) 4Z - M > 0

OA is C

I did this question in 1 min 37 secs and i thought it to be correct (selected E)
However,it is C
I am confused when i combine the two statements. I get Z > 0. When i plug in the value of Z in statement (2) i get m < 4. This gives E as the answer.

When i plug in the value of Z in statement (1) i get m > 3. This gives C as the answer.

Please help me identifying my mistake.

Please reply

Thanks & Regards
Sachin
Never surrender
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:29 am
sachin_yadav wrote:Is m + z > 0
(1) m - 3z > 0
(2) 4z - m > 0
Target question: m + z > 0

Statement 1: m - 3z > 0
There are several sets of numbers that meet this condition. Here are two:
Case a: m = 4 and z = 1, in which case m + z is greater than 0
Case a: m = 4 and z = -10, in which case m + z is not greater than 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: 4z - m > 0
There are several sets of numbers that meet this condition. Here are two:
Case a: m = 1 and z = 4, in which case m + z is greater than 0
Case a: m = -10 and z = 1, in which case m + z is not greater than 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined:
Rearrange statement 1 to get: -3z + m > 0
Statement 2: 4z - m > 0
Since both inequality signs are facing the same direction, we can add the two given inequalities to get: z > 0
In other words, z is positive.

If z is positive, then 3z is positive, and if 3z is positive then m must be positive (since we know that 3z < m)

If z and m are both positive, then m + z must be greater than 0
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer = C

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:30 am
Is m+z>0

(1) m - 3z > 0
(2) 4z - m > 0
Here's another way to handle the two statements combined....

Target question: Is m + z > 0?

Statement 1: m - 3z > 0
There are several sets of numbers that meet this condition. Here are two:
Case a: m = 4 and z = 1, in which case m + z is greater than 0
Case a: m = 4 and z = -10, in which case m + z is not greater than 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: 4z - m > 0
There are several sets of numbers that meet this condition. Here are two:
Case a: m = 1 and z = 4, in which case m + z is greater than 0
Case a: m = -10 and z = 1, in which case m + z is not greater than 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined:
Rearrange statement 1 to get: -3z + m > 0
Statement 2: 4z - m > 0

Multiply both sides of -3z + m > 0 by 5 to get: -15z + 5m > 0
Multiply both sides of 4z - m > 0 by 4 to get: 16z - 4m > 0

Since both inequality signs are facing the same direction, we can ADD the two green inequalities to get: z + m > 0
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer = C

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:36 am
sachin_yadav wrote:Is M + Z > 0
(1) M - 3Z > 0
(2) 4Z - M > 0


I am confused when i combine the two statements. I get Z > 0. When i plug in the value of Z in statement (2) i get m < 4. This gives E as the answer.
Not sure what you mean by plugging in the value of z.
If z is positive, then statement 2 says: 4(some positive number) - m > 0
Add m to both sides to get: 4(some positive number) > m
This doesn't suggest that the answer is E

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by GMATinsight » Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:42 am
sachin_yadav wrote:Is M + Z > 0
(1) M - 3Z > 0
(2) 4Z - M > 0
Hi Sachin,

You can also get the answer by plugging in the values

Question: Is M + Z > 0

The answer has to be in the form of YES or NO

Statement 1) M - 3Z > 0

@M= 1 and Z=1 the result is Negative therefore answer is NO
@M= 10 and Z=1 the result is Positive therefore answer is YES
Inconsistent answer therefore INSUFFICIENT

Statement 2) 4Z - M > 0
@M= 10 and Z=1 the result is Negative therefore answer is NO
@M= 1 and Z=1 the result is Positive therefore answer is YES
Inconsistent answer therefore INSUFFICIENT

Combining the two statements

M - 3Z > 0 and 4Z - M > 0
M > 3Z and M < 4Z
Therefore
3Z < M < 4Z

Also if you add the two equation the we get
M - 3Z + 4Z - M > 0
Z > 0

Combining both inferences we can conclude that both Z and M must be positive.

Therefore M + Z must be positive and greater than 0

SUFFICIENT

Answer : Option C
"GMATinsight"Bhoopendra Singh & Sushma Jha
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour
Join the discussion

by sachin_yadav » Mon Jul 14, 2014 8:04 pm
sachin_yadav wrote:Is M + Z > 0
(1) M - 3Z > 0
(2) 4Z - M > 0


I am confused when i combine the two statements. I get Z > 0. When i plug in the value of Z in statement (2) i get m < 4. This gives E as the answer.
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:Not sure what you mean by plugging in the value of z.
If z is positive, then statement 2 says: 4(some positive number) - m > 0
Add m to both sides to get: 4(some positive number) > m
This doesn't suggest that the answer is E

Cheers,
Brent
Brent,

Thank you so much for your reply.
As you said 4(some positive number) > m and z > 0
Suppose if z = 1, then we get 4 > m or m < 4
Now here we can take negative values of m such as m = -4
Now, m + z > 0
m = -4
z = 1
-4 + 1 > 0
-3 > 0 (that is not possible)

Now if i say m = 3 and z = 1
3 + 1 > 0 (true)

This is the only reason why i am selecting E

Regards
Sachin
Never surrender
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Jul 14, 2014 8:16 pm
In your example, you are ignoring statement 1, which says that 4Z - M > 0. So, you are basically demonstrating that statement 2 ALONE is not sufficient. In other words, if we take statement 2 ALONE, then we can't any conclusions about whether or not m + z > 0.

Likewise, statement 1 ALONE is not sufficient.

However, if we consider statements 1 AND 2, we have sufficient information.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by sachin_yadav » Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:17 am
I think i am not getting you.

I combined both (1) and (2) and got z > 0. Now i am confused where to put this z > 0 to get m.
Should i put in statement (1) or statement (2)
This is the same thing that we do in algebra such as 2x + 3y > 5 and 3x + 4y > 10. Adding them and plugging the value in one of the equations to get another value.

I think this is what we are supposed to do here. I am plugging z > 0 in both the equations, but i am getting different values.

Regards
Sachin
Never surrender
Join the discussion

by GMATinsight » Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:33 am
sachin_yadav wrote:I think i am not getting you.

I combined both (1) and (2) and got z > 0. Now i am confused where to put this z > 0 to get m.
Should i put in statement (1) or statement (2)
This is the same thing that we do in algebra such as 2x + 3y > 5 and 3x + 4y > 10. Adding them and plugging the value in one of the equations to get another value.

I think this is what we are supposed to do here. I am plugging z > 0 in both the equations, but i am getting different values.

Regards
Sachin
Hi Sachin,

You are missing on one thing

Combining the two statements

M - 3Z > 0 and 4Z - M > 0
M > 3Z and M < 4Z
Therefore
3Z < M < 4Z

Also if you add the two equation the we get
M - 3Z + 4Z - M > 0
Z > 0 [You got this already]

If you take any value of Z>0 then you may get different values of M but all values have to be within the range 3Z and 4Z

But more importantly you should also understand that since Z is positive therefore M will also be positive finally rendering the value of M + Z as positive and greater than 0

Therefore SUFFICIENT

Answer : Option C
"GMATinsight"Bhoopendra Singh & Sushma Jha
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour
Join the discussion

by sachin_yadav » Tue Jul 15, 2014 11:23 am
I got it. I missed on this one and was going for E. Thanks and really appreciate it.
GMATinsight wrote:
Hi Sachin,

You are missing on one thing

Combining the two statements

M - 3Z > 0 and 4Z - M > 0
M > 3Z and M < 4Z
Therefore
3Z < M < 4Z

Also if you add the two equation the we get
M - 3Z + 4Z - M > 0
Z > 0 [You got this already]

If you take any value of Z>0 then you may get different values of M but all values have to be within the range 3Z and 4Z

But more importantly you should also understand that since Z is positive therefore M will also be positive finally rendering the value of M + Z as positive and greater than 0

Therefore SUFFICIENT

Answer : Option C
Never surrender
Join the discussion