BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

a small doubt

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by [email protected] » Mon May 05, 2014 11:11 pm
Hi nayasnayas,

This DS question asks is N < 0? This is a YES/NO question. We are told nothing about N to start.

Fact 1: M < N

This is perfect for TESTing VALUES.

If M = 1, N = 2 then the answer to the question is NO.
If M = -2, N = -1 then the answer to the question is YES.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

Fact 2: -N < M

This is also perfect for TESTing Values.

If N = 0, M = 1 then the answer to the question is NO.
If N = -1, M = 2 then the answer to the question is YES.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, we know:
M < N
-N < M

The second inequality can be "multiplied by -1" and becomes....

N > -M

So we know....
M < N
-M < N

With these two in equations, there are only 2 options...
1) M = 0 and N = positive
2) M = pos or neg and N = positive that is greater than both possibilities.

In both situations, the answer to the question is the SAME: the answer is ALWAYS NO.
Combined, SUFFICIENT

Final Answer: C

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by ProGMAT » Mon May 05, 2014 11:27 pm
Statement a) n can be +ve and -ve.
Statement b) n can be +ve and -ve.

Combining both: n can only have +ve values.

Ans : C. What is OA:?
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue May 06, 2014 1:32 am
nayasnayas wrote: Is n < 0 ?

a) m < n
b) -n < m
Here's another approach:

Target question: Is n < 0 ?

Statement 1: m < n
There are several values of m and n that satisfy this condition. Here are two:
Case a: m = -2 and n = -1, in which case n < 0
Case b: m = 0 and n = 1, in which case n > 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: -n < m
There are several values of m and n that satisfy this condition. Here are two:
Case a: m = 2 and n = -1, in which case n < 0
Case b: m = 2 and n = 1, in which case n > 0
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
Statement 1 tells us that m < n
Statement 2 tells us that -n < m
IMPORTANT: Since the inequality signs are FACING IN THE SAME DIRECTION, we can add the inequalities to get...
m + (-n) < n + m
Now subtract m from both sides to get: -n < n
Add n to both sides to get: 0 < 2n
Divide both sides by 2 to get: 0 < n
In other words, n is definitely not less than 0
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer = C

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion