gmatdriller wrote:Hello Mike,
Here the Heads have to follow each other without interruption
in any Tails, right?
In that case, the example given by Sund21(shown below) would be wrong:
"Case 1: Possibility of getting 3 heads on consecutive tosses
HHHTT, TTHHH, THHHT, HTHTH, HTHHH, HHHTH"
I can see that if order matters, we would also have fewer no of cases.
In Binomial(order is not relevant)we have several pattern of 10.
In consecutive, there are only 5 ceases.
Please comment if my explanations are correct,
Thanks
Please
Dear gmatdriller,
I think you misunderstand the exact meaning of the word "
consecutive." The condition stated in the problem is "
What is the probability of getting at least three heads on consecutive tosses?" In other words, three consecutive tosses, three tosses in a row, all have to be H. The string of five tosses must contain, somewhere, a streak of three H's in a row. As long as there are three H's a row, it doesn't matter if the others are head or tails and whether they are adjacent to the streak of three. For example, here are some scenarios that meet the condition:
HHHTT =
YES
HHHTH =
YES
THHHT =
YES
TTHHH =
YES
HTHHH =
YES
Each one of those has a streak of three consecutive H's, so those correctly satisfy the condition. Of course, the condition allows for more than three consecutive heads, because of those important words "
at least", so longer streaks are allowed:
HHHHT =
YES
THHHH =
YES
HHHHH =
YES
Those eight cover all the possibilities in which a series of five coin tosses would have three or more consecutive H's. If the H's are split us, such that there are no streaks of three, then those don't meet the condition. For example
HTHTH =
NO
HHTHH =
NO
Both of those have 3 or more H's, but there is not a streak of three in a row, so they do not meet the condition.
Does all this make sense?
Mike
