BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

multiplen

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed Mar 12, 2014 8:01 am
sgr21 wrote:how many such numbers are there between 1& 500 that are multiples of either 3 or 7 or both?
NOTE: If you say BETWEEN 1 and 500, I'm assuming that we're NOT INCLUDING 1 and 500, otherwise we should say "from 1 to 500 INCLUSIVE"
Also, I'm assuming that you meant to say, "multiples of either 3 or 7 or both["

Okay, onto to solution...

Here's a nice rule: If x and y are multiples of k, then the number of multiples of k from x to y inclusive = [(y-x)/k] + 1
So, for example, the number of multiples of 3 from 6 to 21 inclusive = [(21 - 6)/3] + 1 = [15/3] + 1 = 6

For this question, we must recognize that: multiples of 3 or 7 or both = (multiples of 3) + (multiples of 7) - (multiples of 3 AND 7)
In other words, multiples of 3 or 7 or both = (multiples of 3) + (multiples of 7) - (multiples of 21)

multiples of 3
We want multiples of 3 from 3 to 498 inclusive
Using our formula, this = [(498 - 3)/3] + 1
= [495/3] + 1
= 166

multiples of 7
We want multiples of 7 from 7 to 497 inclusive
Using our formula, this = [(497 - 7)/7] + 1
= [490/7] + 1
= 71

multiples of 21
We want multiples of 21 from 21 to 483 inclusive
Using our formula, this = [(483 - 21)/21] + 1
= [462/21] + 1
= 23

So, multiples of 3 or 7 or both = 166 + 71 - 23) = 214

Cheers,
Brent
Last edited by Brent@GMATPrepNow on Wed Mar 12, 2014 9:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Abhishek009 » Wed Mar 12, 2014 9:48 am
sgr21 wrote:how many such numbers are there between 1& 500 that are multiples of either 3 & 7 or both?
Form Pattern and sets -

Numbers which are multiples of 3 = { 3 , 6 , 9 , 12 , 15 , 18 , 21 ....... }

Total no of Numbers between 1 - 500 which are multiples of 3 is -

500/3 => 166

Numbers which are multiples of 7 = { 7 , 14 , 21 , 28 , 35 , 42 ...... }

Total no of Numbers between 1 - 500 which are multiples of 7 is -

500/7 => 71

Numbers which are multiples of both 3 as well as 7 = { 21 , 42 , 63.......... }

Total no of Numbers between 1 - 500 which are multiples of both 3 and 7 is -

500/21 => 23


Note that the multiples of 3 and 7 is common to both the sets 3 as well as 7 so we are actually double counting it and we need to subtract it to arrive at the correct answer.

So Total No of Numbers is -

166 + 71 - 23

=>214

What's the OA ?
Abhishek
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:46 am
sgr21 wrote:How many integers between 1 and 500, inclusive, are multiples of 3, 7 or both?
This is an OVERLAPPING GROUPS problem.

Total options = Multiples of 3 + Multiples of 7 - Multiples of 21.

The big idea is to SUBTRACT THE OVERLAP.
When we count the multiples of 3 and the multiples of 7, the OVERLAP between the two groups -- the multiples of 21 -- is counted twice.
Hence, the overlap -- the multiples of 21 -- must be subtracted from the total, as shown in the equation above.

Multiples of 3 between 1 and 500, inclusive:
Since 3 is not a factor of either endpoint (1 or 500), we can simply divide 3 into the total number of integers:
500/3 ≈ 166.

Multiples of 7 between 1 and 500, inclusive:
Since 7 is not a factor of either endpoint (1 or 500), we can simply divide 7 into the total number of integers:
500/7 ≈ 71.

Multiples of 21 between 1 and 500, inclusive:
Since 21 is not a factor of either endpoint (1 or 500), we can simply divide 21 into the total number of integers:
500/21 ≈ 23.

Thus:
Total options = 166 + 71 - 23 = 214.

Alternate approach:

Any integer that is a multiple of both 3 and 7 is a multiple of 21.
Count the number of integers between 1 and 21, inclusive, that are divisible by 3, 7, or both:
3, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15, 18, 21
9 options.

Implication:
Between 1 and 500, inclusive, 9 of every 21 integers will be a multiple of 3, 7, or both:
9/21 * 500 = 3/7 * 500 ≈ 3 * 71.4 ≈ 214.2.
Thus, between 1 and 500, inclusive, the number of integers divisible by 3, 7 or both = 214.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by theCodeToGMAT » Wed Mar 12, 2014 8:35 pm
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
sgr21 wrote:how many such numbers are there between 1& 500 that are multiples of either 3 or 7 or both?
NOTE: If you say BETWEEN 1 and 500, I'm assuming that we're NOT INCLUDING 1 and 500, otherwise we should say "from 1 to 500 INCLUSIVE"
Also, I'm assuming that you meant to say, "multiples of either 3 or 7 or both["

Okay, onto to solution...

Here's a nice rule: If x and y are multiples of k, then the number of multiples of k from x to y inclusive = [(y-x)/k] + 1
So, for example, the number of multiples of 3 from 6 to 21 inclusive = [(21 - 6)/3] + 1 = [15/3] + 1 = 6

For this question, we must recognize that: multiples of 3 or 7 or both = (multiples of 3) + (multiples of 5) - (multiples of 3 AND 5)
In other words, multiples of 3 or 7 or both = (multiples of 3) + (multiples of 5) - (multiples of 15)

multiples of 3
We want multiples of 3 from 3 to 498 inclusive
Using our formula, this = [(498 - 3)/3] + 1
= [495/3] + 1
= 166

multiples of 5
We want multiples of 5 from 5 to 495 inclusive
Using our formula, this = [(495 - 5)/5] + 1
= [490/5] + 1
= 99

multiples of 15
We want multiples of 15 from 15 to 495 inclusive
Using our formula, this = [(495 - 15)/15] + 1
= [480/15] + 1
= 33

So, multiples of 3 or 7 or both = 166 + 99 - 33) = 232

Cheers,
Brent
Brent, you mistakenly used "5" for the second part; it's 7 :)
R A H U L
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed Mar 12, 2014 9:44 pm
theCodeToGMAT wrote: Brent, you mistakenly used "5" for the second part; it's 7 :)
You're absolutely right. Thanks Rahul!
I've edited my response accordingly.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion